Adaptive Component Sampling for Faster Quality Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quality assessment methods for components require significant time, reducing production yield, and there is a need for a method to reliably assess quality while minimizing this time, especially under changing production conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that dynamically adapt the selection of components for quality assessment based on production and measurement parameters, using closed-loop control to adjust sampling frequency and measurement strategies, allowing for quick and reliable quality assurance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional quality assessment methods are used to ensure reliable quality control, then quality assurance is maintained, but the time required for quality assessment increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assurance reliabilityVSAvoidquality assessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of the measurement strategy by continuously monitoring production parameters and automatically adjusting the sampling frequency and measurement depth. The system transitions from static, fixed measurement plans to dynamic, adaptive measurement strategies that respond to real-time production conditions, thereby reducing assessment time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs closed-loop feedback by monitoring production parameters (such as machine settings, material batches, environmental conditions) and using this information to adaptively adjust the quality assessment strategy. The feedback mechanism allows the system to identify when reduced measurement intensity is acceptable, thereby reducing time requirements while preserving quality assurance reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If sampling frequency is increased to improve quality assessment reliability under changing production conditions, then quality control reliability is maintained, but production yield is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control reliability under changing conditionsVSAvoidproduction yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sampling frequency based on production parameter stability. When production conditions are stable, the system reduces sampling frequency to maximize productivity. When changes are detected in production parameters, the system automatically increases sampling frequency to maintain quality control reliability, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of sampling frequency adaptively based on production conditions. Instead of using a fixed high sampling frequency that reduces productivity, the system varies this parameter in response to production parameter changes, maintaining reliability only when necessary and maximizing productivity when conditions are stable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive measurement of all components is performed to ensure quality assurance, then quality reliability is improved, but the time required for measurement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial measurement action by selectively measuring only a subset of components based on production parameter analysis. Instead of comprehensively measuring all components, the system identifies and measures only those components that are necessary for quality assurance under current production conditions, thereby reducing measurement time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the measurement process into different levels of intensity based on production conditions. The measurement strategy is divided into multiple segments (full measurement, reduced measurement, spot checking) that are selected adaptively, allowing the system to achieve quality assurance with minimal measurement time by using the appropriate segment for each production context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240085890A1Method and System for Measuring Components and Program
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIKE GMBH
  • US20240085890A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085890A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085890A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for measuring components produced by a production device includes selecting components to be measured from multiple components. The selection is made according to at least one selection parameter. The at least one selection parameter includes a sampling frequency. The method includes determining at least one production parameter. The at least one production parameter includes a production condition. The method includes adapting the sampling frequency based on the production parameter or a change in the production parameter. Adapting includes reducing the sampling frequency in response to one or more production parameters not changing by more than a predetermined amount.