Adaptive Content Display Prioritization for Purchase History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulty in finding specific information after purchasing an item for sale due to mixed content on sale item pages, where frequently and infrequently viewed parts are intermingled, leading to time and effort in locating desired information.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that determines user purchase history to prioritize display of frequently viewed parts after purchase, ensuring these parts are more prominently shown or easily accessible within the content, while less frequently viewed parts are highlighted for non-purchasers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If contents including information of an item for sale are displayed in a fixed manner, then the structure is simple and easy to implement, but users cannot easily find desired information after purchase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of finding desired informationVSAvoidcomplexity of content display system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the content display adaptive rather than fixed. The display configuration changes dynamically based on user purchase status - before purchase showing general information and after purchase highlighting post-purchase relevant parts. This resolves the contradiction by enabling easy information finding through adaptive display while maintaining reasonable system complexity through automated detection and reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes display parameters such as highlighting, positioning, and visibility of content elements based on purchase status. After purchase, the system modifies parameters to emphasize post-purchase information and reduce visibility of pre-purchase information, thereby making desired information easier to find without requiring complex manual search.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If all parts of contents are displayed with equal importance, then the display is simple, but frequently and infrequently viewed parts are mixed making information search time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to find desired informationVSAvoidcomplexity of content prioritization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates content into different priority levels based on viewing frequency and purchase status. Frequently viewed post-purchase parts are extracted and highlighted, while less relevant parts are de-emphasized or hidden. This extraction approach reduces search time by presenting only relevant information prominently while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments content into distinct categories such as pre-purchase information and post-purchase information, then further divides post-purchase information into frequently viewed and rarely viewed parts. This segmentation allows the system to apply different display strategies to different segments, reducing overall search time while keeping the prioritization logic organized and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If content display is customized based on purchase history, then user experience is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user purchase statusVSAvoidcomplexity of personalized display system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by having the system automatically detect purchase status and reconfigure display without manual user input or complex configuration. The system serves itself by using purchase history data to autonomously adjust content prioritization, thereby achieving high adaptability to user status while minimizing operational complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from purchase history data to continuously optimize content display. The system monitors what parts users view after purchase and adjusts future displays accordingly, creating a feedback loop that improves adaptability. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from user behavior and automatically refine its prioritization without requiring complex manual programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9330409B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing program
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 RAKUTEN GROUP INC
  • US9330409B2 patent drawing
  • US9330409B2 patent drawing
  • US9330409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

It is made possible that a user easily find a part which the user wants to see from contents of information of an item for sale purchased by the user. An information processing apparatus determines whether or not a user who requests contents including information of an item for sale has purchased the item for sale. Further, the information processing apparatus identifies a part that has been seen in the contents on the basis of a history indicating at least a displayed part of the contents after purchase of the item for sale. Then, the information processing apparatus causes the contents to be displayed in a state in which the identified part is seen more preferentially when it is determined that the user has purchased the item for sale than when it is determined that the user has not purchased the item for sale.