Adaptive Content Recommendation Timing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to deliver timely and unobtrusive content recommendations, particularly for real-time content, as recommendations may distract users from their current engagement or become stale if delayed.

Innovation Solution

A content recommendation system that determines a user's engagement level with current content and adjusts the timing of recommendations accordingly, blocking recommendations during high engagement and presenting them during periods of lower engagement or when the recommended content is of high predicted interest.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If content recommendations are delivered in real-time, then the timeliness of recommendations is improved, but the user experience deteriorates due to distractions from current content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimeliness of recommendationsVSAvoiduser distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts recommendation delivery based on real-time detection of user engagement state. When engagement is detected, recommendation output is blocked; when disengagement is detected, blocked recommendations are output. This dynamic control resolves the contradiction by making the recommendation system adaptive to user state rather than operating in a fixed real-time mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary detection mechanism that monitors user engagement state between the recommendation generator and the recommendation output. This intermediary layer detects whether the user is engaged with current content and uses this information to gate the flow of recommendations, thereby preventing distractions while maintaining timeliness when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If content recommendations are delayed until user finishes consuming content, then user distraction is reduced, but the recommendations become stale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser distractionVSAvoidrecommendation relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating and blocking recommendations in advance during periods of user engagement. Rather than waiting until content consumption ends, the system proactively creates recommendations and holds them in a blocked state, ready for immediate output once disengagement is detected. This eliminates the staleness problem while still preventing distractions during engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically manages the state of recommendations, transitioning them between blocked and output states based on user engagement detection. This dynamic state management ensures recommendations remain fresh and relevant (generated in advance) while only being delivered at appropriate moments (when user is disengaged), resolving both the distraction and staleness issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors user engagement continuously, then recommendation timing accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-service mechanisms by leveraging existing user interactions with the content delivery system as engagement indicators. Rather than implementing complex external monitoring, the system uses readily available data such as content playback state, pause/seek actions, and channel changes to infer engagement levels. This reduces complexity while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from user interactions with content and previous recommendations to continuously refine engagement detection. By monitoring user responses to delivered recommendations and content consumption patterns, the system adjusts its engagement assessment, improving accuracy over time without requiring proportionally increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250156470A1Systems and methods for optimizing delivery of content recommendations
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US20250156470A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156470A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156470A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The system and methods described herein provide content recommendations to user equipment timed to reduce interruption of content. A content recommendation application detects output of first content and determines viewing metrics for the first content. Using the determined viewing metrics, the content recommendation application determines whether output of a content recommendation should be blocked. In response to determining that the viewing metrics indicate output of the content recommendation should be blocked, the content recommendation application blocks the content recommendation. Upon receiving an input changing output of the first content to output of a second content, the content recommendation application unblocks and outputs the content recommendation.