Adaptive Control Device Injection Molding Frequency Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adaptive control methods for injection molding machines face challenges in automatically adjusting control parameters in response to changes in the controlled target, leading to potential degradation in responsiveness and instability, especially when dealing with unknown or unidentified targets.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive control device and method that incorporates a parallel feed-forward compensator with an identification section to estimate the frequency response characteristic of the controlled target and an adjustment section to automatically adjust the compensation value by setting the PFC frequency and gain, using predetermined coefficients based on the estimated characteristics, ensuring optimal adaptive control without manual re-adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the compensation value from the parallel feed-forward compensator is increased to improve stability, then stability is improved, but responsiveness degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system stabilityVSAvoidresponsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the PFC parameters (gain and frequency) variable rather than fixed. The adjustment section dynamically modifies these parameters based on frequency response characteristics detected from the controlled target, allowing the system to adapt between stability and responsiveness based on actual operating conditions rather than relying on fixed conservative settings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by automatically adjusting the PFC gain and frequency parameters based on detected frequency response characteristics. The adjustment section modifies these parameters according to the actual behavior of the controlled target, enabling optimal balance between stability and responsiveness without manual intervention or excessive compensation values

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If manual adjustment of PFC parameters is performed to achieve optimal control, then control precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to required expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidease of parameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the control system to automatically adjust its own PFC parameters without external intervention. The adjustment section continuously monitors frequency response characteristics and autonomously modifies the PFC gain and frequency to achieve optimal control performance, eliminating the need for operator expertise in manual tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by using the detected frequency response characteristics of the controlled target to automatically adjust the PFC parameters. The system continuously monitors the actual behavior of the controlled target and uses this feedback information to optimize the compensation parameters, achieving high control precision without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If pre-stored gains are used for automatic adjustment, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates when the controlled target changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic parameter adjustmentVSAvoidadaptability to target changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static pre-stored gains to dynamic parameter adjustment. The adjustment section continuously adapts the PFC parameters based on real-time frequency response characteristics of the controlled target, enabling the system to automatically adjust to target changes while maintaining ease of operation through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If model parameters are directly used as control parameters, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to modeling errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach by using frequency response characteristics as a bridge between the controlled target and the PFC parameters. Rather than directly using model parameters, the system detects actual frequency response characteristics and uses these as an intermediary to adjust the PFC gain and frequency, reducing the impact of modeling errors while maintaining system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2752719B1Adaptive control device and adaptive control method, as well as control device and control method for injection molding machine
Publication Date: 2020.01.22 KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KK
  • EP2752719B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2752719B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2752719B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Provided are an adaptive control device and adaptive control method, and a control device of an injection molding machine, which allow optimal adaptive control to be performed automatically and easily, while preventing a degradation of responsiveness. The adaptive control device is configured to perform feedback control in such a manner that an operation value (u) is output based on a command value (r) and a feedback value (ya) which is a sum of a controlled value (y) output from a controlled target (2) and a compensation value (yf) output from a parallel feed-forward compensator (4); wherein the parallel feed-forward compensator (4) includes: an identification section (6) which sequentially estimates a frequency response characteristic of the controlled target (2) and an adjustment section (7) which adjusts the compensation value (yf) based on the estimated frequency response characteristic.