Adaptive Cooking Control Using Refrigeration Temperature Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking and storage systems lack the ability to automatically adjust cooking operations based on the type of food product and its storage temperature, potentially leading to inadequate cooking and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a refrigeration device, a cooking device, and a controller that uses temperature information from the refrigeration device and user-inputted food type to control a sequence of cooking operations, and a holding cabinet with a heater controlled by the same controller to maintain optimal food storage after cooking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the cooking device uses a fixed cooking sequence, then the device complexity is reduced, but the cooking precision and food safety are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller adjusts cooking parameters (time, power level, sequence) based on the storage temperature parameter provided by the refrigeration device. This allows the cooking process to be optimized for different food types and storage conditions, resolving the contradiction by making parameters adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback from the refrigeration device regarding storage temperature, which the controller uses to determine the appropriate cooking sequence. This feedback mechanism enables precise cooking control without requiring complex manual input from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system automatically adjusts cooking operations based on food type and temperature, then food safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller merges multiple functions: receiving food type input from the user, obtaining storage temperature data from the refrigeration device, and determining the appropriate cooking sequence. This consolidation of functions into a single controller improves food safety without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The refrigeration device automatically provides its storage temperature information to the controller without requiring manual measurement or input from the user. This self-service capability enables the system to adjust cooking operations for food safety while minimizing the complexity of user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If the system integrates refrigeration device temperature data with cooking control, then the loss of information is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature informationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller acts as an intermediary that receives and processes temperature information from the refrigeration device and translates it into appropriate cooking sequences. This intermediary role preserves temperature information integrity while managing system complexity through centralized control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures proper cooking and food safety by tailoring cooking sequences to the type and storage temperature of food products, preventing undercooked food and enhancing user experience.

Implementation Method 1

The refrigeration device is arranged to store different types of food product at different temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefrigeration: Cooling

Implementation Method 2

heat or cook food in a variety of different oven types, such as microwave ovens

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrowave heating: Dielectric Heating

Implementation Method 3

convection ovens

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection heating: Convection

Implementation Method 4

The holding cabinet comprises heater

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS8058590B2Cooking and storage systems
Publication Date: 2011.11.15 MANITOWOC FOODSERVICE UK
  • US8058590B2 patent drawing
  • US8058590B2 patent drawing
  • US8058590B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooking and storage system comprises a refrigeration device, a cooking device and controller for controlling the cooking device, and the refrigeration device provides to the controller temperature information relating to the temperature within the refrigeration device.