Adaptive Cross-Layer Wireless Optimization for Distributed XR Tasks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in efficiently optimizing wireless communications for extended reality (XR) applications, particularly in volatile conditions, due to the decomposition of tasks across different devices and the need for cross-layer optimization.

Innovation Solution

Implementing methods and apparatuses for cross-layer optimization in wireless communications, including determining and adjusting transmission parameters and rates based on triggering conditions, and extending the Session Description Protocol (SDP) for capability negotiation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If tasks are decomposed across multiple devices for distributed XR applications, then processing capability and flexibility are improved, but system complexity and coordination overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistributed task execution flexibilityVSAvoidcross-layer optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the XR application tasks into multiple decomposed tasks that can be executed on different devices (WTRU and Edge devices). Each task is assigned specific parameters and transmission rates, allowing independent optimization while maintaining overall system flexibility. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling distributed execution without requiring complex global coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment where transmission parameters and rates are determined based on triggering conditions and volatile network conditions. The system continuously adapts parameters for decomposed tasks based on current network state, enabling flexible distributed execution while keeping optimization complexity manageable through localized dynamic adjustments rather than global reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If transmission parameters are dynamically adjusted based on triggering conditions, then communication efficiency in volatile conditions is improved, but processing overhead and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket transmission efficiencyVSAvoidparameter calculation and adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes triggering conditions that predefine when parameter adjustments should occur. By setting thresholds and conditions in advance, the system avoids continuous parameter recalculation and only adjusts transmission parameters when necessary conditions are met. This preliminary action approach improves transmission efficiency while minimizing processing overhead by avoiding unnecessary calculations during stable network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where transmission parameters are adjusted based on monitored network conditions and triggering events. The system observes network state, compares it against predefined thresholds, and only initiates parameter changes when triggering conditions are satisfied. This feedback-based approach optimizes transmission efficiency while controlling processing overhead by responding only to significant condition changes rather than continuously adjusting parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If cross-layer optimization is implemented for volatile wireless conditions, then reliability of XR applications is improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliability in volatile conditionsVSAvoidcross-layer optimization implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies cross-layer optimization locally to specific decomposed tasks and their associated transmission parameters rather than globally across the entire system. Each task has its own parameter set that can be independently optimized based on local network conditions and task requirements. This local quality approach improves reliability for individual task transmissions while reducing overall system complexity by avoiding global optimization coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250280331A1Methods and apparatuses for cross-layer optimization in wireless communications
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US20250280331A1 patent drawing
  • US20250280331A1 patent drawing
  • US20250280331A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, procedures, and apparatuses for distributed systems cross-layer optimization for extended reality (XR) applications are provided. For example, a method implemented by a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) includes determining a first set of parameters associate with a decomposed task and a first transmission rate for transmitting packets to one or more neighboring nodes; transmitting a first set of packets to the one or more neighboring nodes using the first set of parameters and the first transmission rate; calculating a second transmission rate for transmitting packets to the one or more neighboring nodes; determining a second set of parameters associate with the decomposed task based on a triggering condition being met; and transmitting a second set of packets to the one or more neighboring nodes using the second set of parameters and the second transmission rate.