Adaptive Cruise Control Dynamic Gap Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adaptive cruise control systems often cause unnecessary acceleration or deceleration events, leading to operator discomfort, increased fuel consumption, and reduced fuel economy due to their strict maintenance of desired vehicle speed and gap from lead vehicles.

Innovation Solution

The adaptive cruise control system dynamically adjusts its control parameters based on the actual following gap, traffic conditions, and predicted lead vehicle behavior, employing a flexible following gap and adjusting cruise speed to handle road gradients, thereby optimizing energy efficiency and minimizing unnecessary acceleration and deceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the adaptive cruise control system strictly maintains a desired vehicle speed and desired gap from lead vehicles, then the vehicle can maintain safe following distance and operational control, but unnecessary acceleration or deceleration events occur causing operator discomfort and increased fuel consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe following distance maintenanceVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the desired following gap based on the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and lead vehicle. When the lead vehicle is accelerating, the desired gap increases; when the lead vehicle is decelerating, the desired gap decreases. This dynamic adjustment prevents unnecessary acceleration/deceleration events while maintaining safe following distances, thereby reducing fuel consumption without compromising safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of following gap distance based on operating conditions (relative velocity, road gradient, traffic conditions). By adjusting this parameter dynamically rather than maintaining a fixed gap, the system avoids unnecessary speed changes that would increase fuel consumption, while still ensuring safe operation through minimum gap constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the adaptive cruise control system reacts to movement and changes in operation of lead vehicle by maintaining desired vehicle speed, then the system can respond to traffic conditions, but unnecessary acceleration or deceleration events occur reducing fuel economy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to traffic conditionsVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by adjusting the desired following gap in advance based on predicted lead vehicle behavior and current relative velocity. Instead of reacting to every movement of the lead vehicle with immediate acceleration or deceleration, the system proactively adjusts gap parameters to anticipate needed speed changes, thereby reducing unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining adaptability to traffic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors relative velocity, following gap, and lead vehicle operation changes, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the desired gap and vehicle speed commands. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to traffic conditions intelligently, avoiding unnecessary acceleration/deceleration events that would reduce fuel economy while still responding appropriately to genuine traffic changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the adaptive cruise control system maintains a fixed desired following gap, then the control system is simple to operate, but the system causes operator discomfort due to unnecessary acceleration or deceleration events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidoperator discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static following gap to a dynamic following gap that automatically adjusts based on relative velocity and traffic conditions. This dynamic adjustment smooths out unnecessary acceleration and deceleration events that cause operator discomfort, while the automated nature of the adjustment maintains ease of operation - the driver simply sets the initial desired gap and the system handles the dynamic adjustments automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11167759B2Method and apparatus for controlling a vehicle including an adaptive cruise control system
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11167759B2 patent drawing
  • US11167759B2 patent drawing
  • US11167759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Operating a subject vehicle equipped with an adaptive cruise control system includes setting initial states for control parameters, including setting a desired vehicle speed and determining a desired following gap range, wherein the desired following gap range is associated with a lead vehicle. Operation is controlled via the adaptive cruise control system based upon the initial states for the control parameters. Operation also includes monitoring for presence of the lead vehicle. Upon detecting presence of the lead vehicle, an actual following gap is determined between the subject vehicle and the lead vehicle, and the initial states of the control parameters associated with the adaptive cruise control system are adjusted based upon the actual following gap between the subject vehicle and the lead vehicle, and the desired following gap range. Operation is controlled via the adaptive cruise control system based upon the adjusted initial states of the control parameters.