Adaptive Cruise Control Zone Speed Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Adaptive cruise control systems face challenges in dynamically controlling vehicle speed during cornering, especially in roundabouts, as existing methods struggle to accurately adjust speed based on the planned exit and vehicle position.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that divides a curve into zones, using navigation system data, GPS, environmental sensors, and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication to adjust speed based on the current location and intended exit, with sensors for steering angle and yaw rate to determine direction changes, allowing for adaptive speed control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the vehicle speed is controlled to be substantially constant through the curve, then the speed control is simplified, but the traversal time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed control simplicityVSAvoidcurve traversal time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The curve is divided into multiple zones (first zone, second zone, third zone) along the travel direction. Each zone has different speed control requirements: the first zone allows higher speed, the second zone requires reduced speed, and the third zone permits speed increase again. This segmentation enables optimized traversal time while maintaining control simplicity within each zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The speed control system dynamically adjusts the target speed based on the detected current zone. The control unit changes the speed reference values according to the zone information, allowing the vehicle to accelerate in suitable zones and decelerate in critical zones, rather than maintaining a constant speed throughout the entire curve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the vehicle speed is reduced in the second zone to ensure safe traversal, then safety is improved, but the overall traversal time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe curve traversalVSAvoidtime spent in reduced speed zone
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system detects the current zone in advance and proactively adjusts the target speed before the vehicle enters the second zone. By preparing the speed reduction beforehand and only applying it in the critical second zone, the system ensures safety while minimizing the total time spent at reduced speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Different speed control strategies are applied to different spatial zones of the curve. The first and third zones allow higher speeds with relaxed control, while only the second zone requires strict speed reduction. This localized quality approach ensures safety is improved where needed without unnecessarily reducing speed in safer zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the system divides the curve into multiple zones and adjusts speed dynamically, then productivity is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurve traversal efficiencyVSAvoidspeed control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously detects the current zone based on vehicle position and compares it with the target zone information. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically adjust the target speed according to the current zone without requiring complex manual intervention or overly sophisticated control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit performs multiple functions: it detects the current zone, determines the target zone, calculates the target speed, and controls the actual speed. By consolidating these functions into a single control unit that handles all aspects of zone-based speed control, the system achieves high productivity without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If the system uses multiple sensors and navigation data to detect position and exit, then measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle position and exit detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor and system integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines data from multiple sources including GPS receivers, on-board environmental sensors, optical imaging devices, and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication into a unified control system. By merging these diverse data sources and processing them together in the control unit, the system achieves high measurement precision while managing complexity through integrated processing rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11639103B2Vehicle speed control in a curve
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11639103B2 patent drawing
  • US11639103B2 patent drawing
  • US11639103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Controlling the speed of a motor vehicle with an adaptive cruise control system in a curve can include dynamically adjusting the speed of the motor vehicle depending on the planned exit from the roundabout and the current position of the motor vehicle.