Adaptive Data Collection Nodes for Heterogeneous Network Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication network technologies face challenges in effectively collecting, aggregating, and analyzing data in dynamic environments, leading to delays in fault detection and service level agreement (SLA) maintenance due to static data collection and aggregation methods, which are inadequate for handling dynamic network and user conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for determining impact characteristics in a distributed heterogeneous communication network to dynamically select collection, aggregation, and analysis nodes, enabling adaptive data collection, aggregation, and analysis based on user, service, slice, and network characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static data collection and aggregation methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but fault detection timeliness and SLA maintenance effectiveness deteriorate under dynamic network conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection and aggregation system complexityVSAvoidfault detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic data collection and aggregation by enabling the system to adaptively adjust monitoring parameters, data collection frequency, and aggregation rules based on real-time network conditions and user behavior patterns. This allows the system to respond promptly to dynamic changes in network traffic, user mobility, and service requirements, thereby reducing fault detection time while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated adaptation rather than static configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes monitoring parameters such as data collection intervals, aggregation thresholds, and analysis granularity based on network conditions and user characteristics. By adjusting these parameters in real-time, the system optimizes fault detection speed and accuracy without requiring complete system redesign, thus resolving the contradiction between simplicity and responsiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If monitoring data is collected from all network sources, then measurement completeness is improved, but network overhead and processing delay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring data completenessVSAvoidnetwork overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by collecting and aggregating data with different levels of detail from different network sources based on their specific characteristics and importance. Critical network elements receive enhanced monitoring with higher data collection frequency and granularity, while less critical elements use reduced monitoring. This selective approach ensures measurement completeness for important parameters while reducing overall network overhead and processing burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial data collection and aggregation by focusing resources on collecting only the most relevant monitoring data needed for fault detection and SLA maintenance, rather than collecting all possible data from all sources. This selective partial action reduces network overhead and processing delays while maintaining sufficient measurement precision for effective network management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Stability of the object's composition

If data aggregation is performed at a centralized location, then data processing consistency is improved, but transmission delay and network overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing consistencyVSAvoiddata processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data aggregation function into multiple distributed aggregation nodes throughout the network rather than using a single centralized location. Each aggregation node processes and aggregates data locally for its designated network segment, maintaining consistency within that segment while reducing transmission distances and delays. This segmented approach balances processing consistency with improved speed by eliminating the single-point bottleneck

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-dimensional centralized aggregation model to a multi-dimensional distributed aggregation architecture where data can be aggregated along multiple dimensions (local segment, regional zone, global network) simultaneously. This dimensional change allows consistent processing to occur at multiple levels, reducing the transmission burden on any single aggregation point while maintaining overall data consistency across the network

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10965558B2Method and system for effective data collection, aggregation, and analysis in distributed heterogeneous communication network
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 WIPRO LTD
  • US10965558B2 patent drawing
  • US10965558B2 patent drawing
  • US10965558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to methods and systems for effective data collection, aggregation, and analysis in a distributed heterogeneous communication network for effective fault detection or performance anomaly detection. In one embodiment, the method may include determining impact characteristics with respect to a network slice or a service in the distributed heterogeneous communication network. The method may further include determining one or more collection nodes, one or more aggregation nodes, and one or more analysis nodes within the distributed heterogeneous communication network based on the impact characteristics. The method may further include activating the one or more collection nodes for collecting data, the one or more aggregation nodes for aggregating the collected data, and the one or more analysis nodes for analyzing the aggregated data. The impact characteristics may include at least one of: user characteristics, service characteristics, slice characteristics, network characteristics, or performance characteristics.