Adaptive Data Processing System for Complex Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing predictive data processing methods for complex dynamics, such as keying, generic algorithms, heuristics, meta-heuristics, and Artificial Neural Networks, face challenges including reduced processing speed, high memory requirements, risk of false positives, over-fitting, and the need for extensive computational resources, making them inefficient for real-time and accurate simulations.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive data processing system that applies multiple predictive algorithms or rule-sets to an atomized model, allowing propositions to compete through rating cells updated by external feedback, enabling adaptive model updates and selecting the best fit for the system during learning and execution modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If keying or hashed keying is implemented to process large amounts of data, then data processing capability is improved, but processing speed diminishes over time and real-time synchronization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing task by dividing the feature space into multiple partitions or buckets. Instead of processing all data through a single keying operation, the system distributes data across multiple segments, allowing parallel processing and maintaining speed even as data volume increases. This is achieved through hash-based partitioning where different data streams are routed to different processing segments simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If multiple bits per feature are used in keying, then information density is improved, but memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation densityVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional bitstring approach to a multi-dimensional sparse matrix representation. Instead of increasing bits per feature in a linear fashion, the system uses a matrix structure where features are distributed across rows and columns, allowing efficient storage through sparsity. This dimensional transformation enables higher information density without linearly increasing memory consumption, as only non-zero elements need to be stored.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If generic algorithms are used to handle unstable real-time data, then adaptability is improved, but execution time increases causing delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to unstable dataVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and storing statistical properties, feature distributions, and transformation rules during offline preparation phases. When unstable real-time data arrives, the system leverages these pre-computed structures to rapidly adapt without executing full generic algorithms. This includes pre-built decision trees, cached transformation matrices, and predetermined handling rules for common data patterns, enabling fast response to unstable inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If Artificial Neural Networks are trained to improve predictive accuracy, then model precision is improved, but computational resources and complexity increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs simplified, lightweight predictive models that can be rapidly instantiated and discarded, replacing complex trained neural networks. Instead of maintaining large pre-trained models requiring substantial computational resources, the system uses simpler statistical models, rule-based systems, or shallow networks that consume fewer resources. These lighter models are retrained or reconfigured frequently using incremental learning, providing comparable accuracy with fraction of the computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS11604937B2Systems and methods for adaptive data processing associated with complex dynamics
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 ANDERSSON KARE L
  • US11604937B2 patent drawing
  • US11604937B2 patent drawing
  • US11604937B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for adaptive data processing associated with complex dynamics are provided. The method may include applying the two or more predictive algorithms or rule-sets to an atomized model to generate applied data models. After receipt of inputs, the method may further include processing at least two propositions during a learning mode based upon detection of an absolute pattern within the applied data models; wherein propositions are action proposals associated with each predictive algorithm. At least two propositions may compete against each other through the use of an associated rating cell, which may be updated based upon the detected patterns. The method may further include processing propositions during an execution mode based upon detection of an absolute condition, wherein the rating cells are updated based upon these detected conditions. Further, these updated rating cells may be provided as feedback to update the atomized model.