Adaptive Deep-Brain Stimulation for Neural Activity-Based Tic Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep brain stimulation (DBS) methods for Tourette Syndrome (TS) provide limited therapeutic effects and require continuous or scheduled electrical stimulation, which may not fully address the frequency and severity of motor and vocal tics, and there is a need for more effective treatment paradigms.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop, adaptive DBS system that adjusts electrical stimulation parameters based on neural activity signals, specifically monitoring power variations in certain frequency bands to anticipate and mitigate tics by modifying parameters such as pulse frequency and width in response to detected neural activity patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous or scheduled DBS stimulation is applied to treat Tourette Syndrome, then some therapeutic effect is achieved and battery life is prolonged, but the treatment efficacy is limited and does not fully address the frequency and severity of tics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidstimulation control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors local field potentials (LFPs) from the brain region and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust stimulation parameters. The controller detects tic-related neural activity patterns and modifies pulse frequency, amplitude, or width in real-time to optimize therapeutic effect while reducing unnecessary stimulation, thereby improving efficacy without requiring complex external monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The DBS system transitions from static, pre-programmed stimulation schedules to dynamic, adaptive parameter adjustment. The stimulation parameters are continuously modified based on real-time neural activity detection, allowing the system to respond to changing tic patterns and neural states, thus improving treatment effectiveness while maintaining manageable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If intermittent or scheduled DBS is used instead of continuous stimulation, then battery life is prolonged, but therapeutic effect is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifeVSAvoidtherapeutic effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses LFP monitoring to detect when tic-related neural activity is present and activates or intensifies stimulation only during these periods. This feedback-driven approach ensures therapeutic effect is maintained during critical moments while minimizing stimulation during periods when tics are not occurring, thereby extending battery life without compromising treatment effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuous or fixed-interval stimulation, the system applies stimulation periodically based on detected neural activity patterns. The stimulation is delivered in response to specific LFP patterns that precede or accompany tics, creating an adaptive periodic action that optimizes both battery consumption and therapeutic effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If DBS parameters are fixed and continuously applied, then simple control is maintained, but the system cannot adapt to varying tic patterns and neural activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to neural activityVSAvoidparameter adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller receives continuous feedback from LFP electrodes and automatically adjusts stimulation parameters based on detected neural activity patterns. This closed-loop feedback system enables adaptation to varying tic patterns without requiring complex external programming or manual intervention, maintaining manageable device complexity while achieving high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The DBS system performs self-adjustment of stimulation parameters based on its own monitoring of neural activity. The controller autonomously modifies pulse frequency, amplitude, or width in response to detected LFP patterns, enabling the system to adapt to changing tic patterns without external control, thus improving versatility while keeping the control mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250262436A1Method for modifying electrical brain stimulation
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 NEWRONIKA
  • US20250262436A1 patent drawing
  • US20250262436A1 patent drawing
  • US20250262436A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are deep-brain stimulation (DBS) systems and methods for the treatment of Tourette Syndrome (TS). The DBS methods described herein comprise a stimulation paradigm that may help to reduce the frequency and/or severity of motor and vocal tics, as well as rapid and involuntary muscle motions that are characteristic of TS. One variation of a method for the treatment of TS comprises adjusting electrical stimulation to a target brain region based on changes or variations in the neural activity signals in the target brain region. One example of a method described herein comprises monitoring the power values (e.g., spectral power values) of one or more frequency bands of the acquired neural activity signals and adjusting electrical stimulation parameters based on at least one variation or change of the monitored power values.