Adaptive DC Offset Correction in Direct Conversion Receivers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Direct conversion receiver systems face challenges in correcting DC offset errors due to I/Q mismatch and intrinsic LO self-mixing, which degrade signal quality and are not optimally addressed by existing methods that are often protocol-specific and ineffective under changing signal conditions.

Innovation Solution

A DC offset correction (DCOC) component that selects and transitions between multiple algorithms based on signal quality estimates, using a signal quality estimator to determine the optimal algorithm for the current operating environment, ensuring effective correction of DC offset errors in both I and Q signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional DC offset correction strategies are used, then DC offset errors can be corrected under specific conditions, but the system cannot provide optimal performance for all operating conditions and signal conditions may change in an operating environment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDC offset correction effectivenessVSAvoidadaptability to changing signal conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between different DC offset correction algorithms based on signal conditions. A state machine monitors signal quality metrics and automatically switches between algorithms (e.g., from algorithm 1 for weak signals to algorithm 2 for strong signals), making the correction system adaptive to changing operating environments rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different correction algorithms based on signal strength thresholds. When signal quality metrics cross predefined thresholds, the system transitions between algorithms with different correction characteristics, effectively changing the correction approach to match current signal conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple DC offset correction algorithms are implemented, then optimal performance for all operating conditions can be achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing signal conditionsVSAvoidDC offset correction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The correction system is segmented into multiple independent algorithms, each optimized for specific signal conditions. Rather than one complex algorithm, the system divides the correction task across several simpler algorithms (e.g., one for weak signals, another for strong signals), with a state machine selecting the appropriate segment based on current conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A state machine acts as an intermediary between the multiple correction algorithms and the signal processing path. This intermediary monitors signal quality metrics and routes the signal through the appropriate correction algorithm, managing the complexity of having multiple algorithms without requiring complex integration logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If DC offset correction is continuously applied, then signal quality is maintained, but battery power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidbattery power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous correction, the system applies DC offset correction periodically based on signal quality assessments. The state machine evaluates signal metrics and activates correction algorithms only when needed (e.g., when signal quality degrades or transitions between strength thresholds), reducing unnecessary power consumption while maintaining signal quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The correction system applies different levels of correction based on local signal conditions. Rather than uniformly applying correction at full power continuously, the system adjusts correction intensity and algorithm selection based on local signal quality metrics, applying stronger correction only when signal conditions warrant it

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2374213B1Method and apparatus for removing DC offset error in a direct conversion receiver
Publication Date: 2015.06.03 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP2374213B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2374213B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2374213B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and apparatus for correcting direct current (DC) offset errors of a received signal in a direct conversion receiver (DCR) are provided. DC offset correction algorithms are incorporated into the DCR, each algorithm being optimized for a particular receive signal operating environment. The DC offset correction algorithms remove DC offset errors in baseband In-phase and Quadrature-phase signals received within the direct conversion receiver baseband signal path. Individual DC offset correction algorithms are selected for use as determined by a signal quality estimator component. A DC offset correction component of the direct conversion receiver determines an appropriate DC offset correction algorithm suited for a particular operating environment. A criterion for a signal quality estimate is set to control transitioning between DCOC algorithms. A dual threshold strategy may be adopted to transition between one DC offset correction algorithm and another DC offset correction algorithm to provide hysteresis.