Adaptive Decorrelation Filter Control for Spatial Audio Ambiance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decorrelation filters in spatial audio processing are time-invariant, failing to adapt to variations in auditory scenes, leading to unnatural ambiance in decoded audio signals.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive control of decorrelation filter length based on transmitted performance measures and signal properties, such as reverberation length, correlation measures, and spatial width, to match the characteristics of the input audio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If time-invariant decorrelation filters are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to variations in auditory scenes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecorrelation filter complexityVSAvoidadaptability to auditory scene variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the Dynamics principle by transitioning from static, time-invariant decorrelation filters to dynamic, time-varying filters that adapt their characteristics based on the current auditory scene. The filter parameters are continuously adjusted according to measured properties of the audio signal, enabling the system to respond to temporal variations in the auditory environment while maintaining manageable complexity through structured adaptation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements Parameter changes by modifying key parameters of the decorrelation filter (such as filter order, coefficients, or structure) based on measured properties of the input audio signal. These parameters are dynamically adjusted to match the characteristics of the auditory scene, allowing the filter to optimize its performance for different types of audio content without requiring complete redesign of the filter architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If adaptive control of decorrelation filter length is implemented, then perceived quality of decoded audio is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperceived quality of decoded audioVSAvoiddecorrelation filter control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the Feedback principle by measuring properties of the decoded audio signal (such as correlation measures, spectral characteristics, or temporal features) and using these measurements to adjust the decorrelation filter length and parameters. This closed-loop approach ensures that the filter adaptation is guided by actual signal characteristics, improving perceived quality while keeping the control mechanism systematic and manageable through defined feedback paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements Preliminary action by pre-defining a set of possible filter lengths and configurations that can be selected based on measured signal properties. Rather than allowing continuous arbitrary adjustment, the system prepares a discrete set of optimized filter options in advance, which are then selected based on real-time measurements. This approach improves quality by ensuring each configuration is pre-optimized while reducing complexity by limiting the adaptation space to a finite set of choices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260112376A1Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20260112376A1 patent drawing
  • US20260112376A1 patent drawing
  • US20260112376A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An audio signal processing method and apparatus for adaptively adjusting a decorrelator. The method comprises obtaining a control parameter and calculating mean and variation of the control parameter. Ratio of the variation and mean of the control parameter is calculated, and a decorrelation parameter is calculated based on the said ratio. The decorrelation parameter is then provided to a decorrelator.