Adaptive Delivery Scheduling System with Dynamic Wave Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic systems for managing deliveries are inflexible and unable to adapt to increasing volumes, new customer demands, and dynamic changes, particularly in handling premium, rushed, or lowest-cost deliveries, and they lack real-time communication capabilities, making them inefficient and rigid.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system that uses machine-learning techniques to determine optimal fulfillment centers, generate graphical user interfaces for adaptive delivery scheduling, and dynamically adjust delivery processes, including wave and shift processes, to prioritize and manage deliveries efficiently, and automatically generate shipping labels with real-time information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If standard electronic systems batch orders for delivery, then operational simplicity is maintained, but delivery speed and customer satisfaction deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoiddelivery speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts delivery wave assignments based on real-time order characteristics, customer preferences, and fulfillment center capacity. Instead of static batching, the system continuously optimizes which orders are grouped together and when they are shipped, allowing delivery speed to vary dynamically while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters such as delivery wave timing, fulfillment center selection, and order grouping criteria based on real-time conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system can expedite certain deliveries while maintaining overall operational simplicity through automated parameter optimization rather than manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If electronic systems use rigid established operations, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability to new customer demands deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to new demands
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains stability through its core automated scheduling framework while introducing dynamic adaptability through real-time adjustment of delivery waves, fulfillment center assignments, and order grouping. The stable automated operation provides a reliable foundation that can adapt to new customer demands without requiring fundamental system changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the delivery process into independent, manageable components (order reception, fulfillment center selection, wave assignment, shipping) that can be independently optimized and adjusted. This segmentation allows the system to maintain overall stability while adapting specific segments to new customer demands, such as adding premium delivery options or adjusting wave timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple platforms are used throughout the distribution chain, then specific functional requirements are met, but system complexity and communication efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple previously separate functions (order management, fulfillment center selection, delivery wave scheduling, and shipping coordination) into a single integrated automated platform. This consolidation maintains the functional capabilities of multiple specialized systems while reducing overall complexity by eliminating the need for multiple separate platforms and their associated communication interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10769588B1Systems and methods for generating graphical user interfaces for adaptive delivery scheduling
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 COUPANG CORP
  • US10769588B1 patent drawing
  • US10769588B1 patent drawing
  • US10769588B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized system for delivery scheduling. The system may include a processor and a non transitory storage medium comprising instructions. When executed by the at least one processor, the instructions may cause the at least one processor to perform steps. The steps may include receiving (from a remote system) an electronic request to order a product, determining information associated with the remote system and a fulfillment center associated with the information and the product, generating an electronic message, and forwarding (to the fulfillment center) the electronic message and instructions to generate a graphical user interface displaying request with the product and the delivery wave estimate.