Adaptive Demodulation Threshold for Wireless Sensor Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless sensor networks face challenges in achieving low power consumption and low complexity while maintaining performance, particularly in super-regenerative receivers, which experience performance degradation due to low selectivity in frequency response and DC offset issues affecting bit error rates.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for adaptively setting a demodulation threshold based on previously received symbols, using a comparison value and weighted values to determine the threshold change, calculated through exponential functions and Taylor series, to optimize demodulation of currently received symbols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed threshold is used for signal demodulation, then the device complexity is low, but the bit error rate increases due to DC offset and fading effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit error rateVSAvoidthreshold adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a fixed threshold to a time-varying adaptive threshold that changes according to signal conditions. The threshold is continuously adjusted based on the demodulation values of previously received symbols, allowing the system to adapt to DC offset and fading effects while maintaining low complexity through a simple recursive update mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the demodulation values of previously received symbols to adjust the current threshold. The system feeds back the threshold adjustment information based on the comparison between the current symbol and previous symbols, creating a closed-loop system that automatically corrects for DC offset and fading without requiring complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If advanced signal processing techniques are used to improve demodulation performance, then the bit error rate decreases, but the power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemodulation performanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the receiver to automatically adjust its own threshold based on the received signal characteristics. The system uses the demodulation values of previously received symbols to self-correct for DC offset and fading effects, eliminating the need for complex external processing or high-power signal processing techniques while maintaining good demodulation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the threshold parameter based on signal conditions. Instead of using complex signal processing techniques that consume high power, the system simply changes the threshold parameter recursively using the formula: threshold[n] = threshold[n-1] + α × (symbol[n-1] - threshold[n-1]), where α is a small adjustment factor. This parameter change approach achieves good demodulation performance with minimal power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the threshold is adjusted based on multiple previous symbols, then the adaptability improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreshold adaptabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by using a recursive threshold update mechanism that incorporates multiple previous symbols indirectly through the evolving threshold value. Instead of directly processing multiple symbols at each step, the system dynamically updates the threshold using the previous threshold and the most recent symbol, achieving adaptability through the cumulative effect of sequential updates: threshold[n] = threshold[n-1] + α × (symbol[n-1] - threshold[n-1]).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by using only the most recent symbol for threshold adjustment at each step, rather than processing all previous symbols equally. The recursive formula threshold[n] = threshold[n-1] + α × (symbol[n-1] - threshold[n-1]) uses only the latest symbol difference, which is sufficient to track signal changes. The small adjustment factor α ensures that historical information is implicitly incorporated without requiring explicit processing of multiple symbols, reducing computational complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9172415B2Method and apparatus for adaptively setting threshold for signal demodulation
Publication Date: 2015.10.27 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9172415B2 patent drawing
  • US9172415B2 patent drawing
  • US9172415B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method and apparatus to adaptively set a threshold for signal demodulation. The apparatus and the method include adaptively setting a threshold to demodulate a currently received symbol based on the demodulation value of a previously received symbol based on a comparison value. The comparison value is obtained by comparing a number of previously received symbols having a demodulation value of “0” and a number of currently received symbols having a demodulation value of “1”.