Adaptive Device Throttle for Agreement Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the ability to throttle electronic devices or control information flow based on compliance with agreements or events, such as school grades, weather conditions, or location, offering only binary on/off functionality, which fails to adaptively manage device functionality or information access in response to user activities or external factors.

Innovation Solution

A schedule and location-responsive agreement compliance controlled information throttle system that monitors electronic device usage and adjusts functionality or information access based on predefined agreements, allowing for partial reduction or increase in device performance and information bandwidth in response to user compliance, location, and events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If binary on/off content filtering is used to control electronic device access, then device functionality is completely blocked or fully enabled, but the system lacks adaptive management capability to adjust functionality based on user compliance or environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive management capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic throttling of electronic device functionality by transitioning from static binary on/off filtering to a dynamic system that continuously adjusts device capabilities based on real-time monitoring of user compliance with agreements and environmental conditions. The system dynamically modifies parameters such as network bandwidth allocation, application execution permissions, and device operational modes in response to changing compliance status and contextual factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously to achieve adaptive management: it monitors compliance parameters (agreement fulfillment status), environmental parameters (location, time, weather conditions), and dynamically adjusts functionality parameters (device capabilities, information access levels, network throughput). This multi-parameter approach enables granular control over device behavior based on complex conditional logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If complete blocking of device functionality is implemented when agreements are not satisfied, then compliance enforcement is strict, but the system loses the ability to provide partial functionality or graduated access levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance enforcementVSAvoidfunctionality adjustment range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing graduated throttling levels rather than complete blocking. When users fail to meet agreement requirements, the system partially restricts device functionality by reducing network bandwidth allocation, limiting application access, or degrading service quality to acceptable-but-reduced levels. This allows compliance enforcement while maintaining baseline functionality and enabling progressive restoration of full capabilities as compliance improves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system monitors and controls device functionality based on multiple conditions (agreements, location, time, events), then compliance management becomes comprehensive, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance management comprehensivenessVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the compliance monitoring and enforcement system into distinct modular components: agreement management modules that handle specific compliance agreements, location monitoring modules that track geographic context, time management modules that enforce temporal restrictions, and event detection modules that respond to external conditions. Each segment operates semi-independently and contributes to the overall throttling decision through coordinated interaction, reducing the complexity burden on any single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-functional monitoring and control mechanisms that serve multiple purposes simultaneously. The same infrastructure monitors both user compliance with agreements and environmental conditions (location, time, weather), and uses this combined information to enforce throttling policies. This universal approach avoids duplicating monitoring systems for different functions and enables integrated decision-making across multiple control dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9847948B2Schedule and location responsive agreement compliance controlled device throttle
Publication Date: 2017.12.19 ETURI CORP
  • US9847948B2 patent drawing
  • US9847948B2 patent drawing
  • US9847948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Controls electronic devices and/or throttles electronic devices and/or information for electronic devices based on agreements or events and/or based on schedule, location, time, or any combination thereof. An agreement includes condition(s) to satisfy the agreement, such as task(s) or activities to be performed by an agreement performer, for example based on a schedule and/or location, at a particular time, or time period, or, or events that may be detected, and actions performed to enforce or assert the agreement. Actions may include controlling the electronic device and/or at least partially enabling/disabling or otherwise limiting, reducing or increasing the amount or type of information allowed with respect to any or all electronic devices associated with the agreement performer. Embodiments may reduce or block information from particular sources during a scheduled school class to limit web surfing for information related to that class based on a schedule and/or location of the electronic device.