Adaptive Diagnostic Instrument for Faster Behavioral Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for diagnosing behavioral disorders, developmental delays, and neurological impairments are inefficient and inaccurate due to the relatedness of condition types, leading to overlapping symptoms and incorrect diagnoses, and often require lengthy questionnaires that are time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a diagnostic instrument that receives input, generates a model of likelihood for multiple conditions, identifies the next input to reduce uncertainty, and provides an efficient classification based on a machine learning model and Monte Carlo methods, reducing the number of questions needed for accurate diagnosis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional observational techniques and questionnaires are used to evaluate behavioral disorders, developmental delays, and neurological impairments, then comprehensive data collection is achieved, but the evaluation process becomes time-consuming and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic instrument dynamically adapts the questionnaire based on previous responses, selecting and presenting subsequent questions in real-time based on the individual's answers. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to focus on relevant symptoms and differentiate between related conditions more efficiently, reducing unnecessary questions while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters of the evaluation process by using machine learning models to determine which questions to ask next based on the current state of diagnostic uncertainty. The questionnaire structure transforms from a fixed sequence to a flexible, adaptive sequence that optimizes information gathering efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple interviews are conducted to ensure accurate diagnosis, then diagnostic thoroughness is improved, but cost and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic instrument incorporates feedback loops where each response influences subsequent question selection. The machine learning model continuously updates the diagnostic probability distribution based on incoming responses, allowing the system to adaptively refine the evaluation path and reduce the number of interviews needed while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of multiple sequential interviews with a computational system that uses machine learning algorithms to process responses and guide the evaluation. This substitution automates the diagnostic reasoning process, reducing the need for repeated human interviews while maintaining or improving diagnostic reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive questionnaires are administered to differentiate between related conditions, then diagnostic coverage is improved, but the number of questions and administrative burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondition differentiation accuracyVSAvoiddiagnosis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive questionnaire is segmented into adaptive modules where only relevant sections are administered based on initial responses. The machine learning model identifies which symptom clusters are most relevant for differentiating between specific conditions, allowing the system to segment the evaluation into focused subsets rather than administering all questions uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by administering only the necessary subset of questions required to achieve sufficient diagnostic confidence. Rather than completing the full comprehensive questionnaire, the adaptive instrument stops when the machine learning model determines that diagnostic uncertainty has been reduced to an acceptable level, avoiding excessive questioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Loss of information

If traditional techniques are used to evaluate overlapping symptoms, then all symptoms are captured, but correct differentiation between conditions becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesymptom information completenessVSAvoidcondition classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by using machine learning models to pre-analyze response patterns and identify which symptoms are most discriminative for differentiating between related conditions. The questionnaire is guided by pre-computed insights about which symptom combinations are most useful for condition differentiation, allowing the system to capture relevant information more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12518867B2Efficient diagnosis of behavioral disorders, developmental delays, and neurological impairments
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 COGNOA INC
  • US12518867B2 patent drawing
  • US12518867B2 patent drawing
  • US12518867B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is software used to evaluate individuals such as children for behavioral disorders, developmental delays, and neurological impairments. Specifically, described herein is software configured for use along with methods, devices, systems, and platforms that are used to analyze to aid in the positive or negative diagnosis of individuals for one or more behavioral disorders, developmental delays, and neurological impairments.