Adaptive Digital Health Intervention System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional approaches for tracking and changing individual or group behavior are inadequate, as they lack the ability to implement complex scenarios, capture context-based values, and provide dynamic interventions, failing to adapt automatically and requiring frequent reprogramming.

Innovation Solution

A system that collects and analyzes data from various sources to set and manage measurement goals, generate markers, and execute triggering actions, using fuzzy logic and machine learning models to adjust goals and interventions based on sensor data, allowing for personalized and adaptive behavior modification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional approaches use simple triggers to monitor goals, then the system is easy to operate, but it cannot address personalized medicine or personalized health issues which are complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to address personalized health issuesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments behavior tracking into multiple hierarchical levels: simple triggers for basic monitoring, fuzzy logic rules for contextual interpretation, and machine learning models for complex pattern recognition. This allows the system to handle both simple and complex personalized health scenarios by activating appropriate processing layers based on goal requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Fuzzy logic acts as an intermediary layer between simple triggers and complex machine learning models. It translates raw sensor data into contextualized behavior assessments, enabling personalized health tracking without requiring full machine learning complexity for every decision. The fuzzy logic controller mediates between input data and intervention decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If conventional systems repeatedly reprogram by humans, then the system maintains simplicity, but it loses the ability to automatically adapt to changing contexts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic adaptation capabilityVSAvoidsystem implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated feedback loops where machine learning models continuously learn from sensor data and automatically adjust fuzzy logic rules and intervention strategies. The system self-updates its behavior tracking parameters and intervention thresholds without human reprogramming, adapting automatically to changing user contexts and patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple feedback loops are embedded throughout the system: sensor data feeds back to fuzzy logic controllers which adjust triggers, and outcomes feed back to machine learning models which refine predictions. This continuous feedback enables automatic adaptation while maintaining system coherence through structured information flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If conventional approaches use simple triggers, then the device complexity is low, but they fail to capture values of an individual based on context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual information captureVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static triggers to dynamic fuzzy logic rules that adapt their thresholds and weights based on contextual information. Fuzzy logic variables dynamically adjust sensitivity to different sensor inputs based on time of day, user state, and environmental conditions, enabling contextual interpretation without requiring complex rigid decision trees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If conventional systems lack feedback loops, then the system is simpler to implement, but it cannot perform error correction or control factors to help the system automatically adapt

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Feedback loops are integrated at multiple system levels: sensor validation feedback detects and corrects data errors, fuzzy logic feedback adjusts rule parameters based on outcome analysis, and machine learning feedback continuously refines prediction models. These feedback mechanisms provide automatic error correction while maintaining architectural coherence through standardized information flow patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11043139B1Providing digital health interventions
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 VIGNET INC
  • US11043139B1 patent drawing
  • US11043139B1 patent drawing
  • US11043139B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for personalized digital goal setting and intervention are provided. Embodiments of the system allow for effective management and implementation of interventions to change behaviors or health statuses of individuals or groups. Systems and methods may include setting a measurement goal relating to a behavior or a health status and generating a marker based on the measurement goal, receiving sensor data, determining that at least one of the measurement goal or the marker is satisfied, and executing a triggering action. The triggering action may include at least one of controlling access to a user device, controlling access to an application stored on a user device, controlling access of a user device to a network, controlling access of a user device to a website, displaying a notification on the user device, or transmitting a command to a remote device, including an instruction to control access to a physical space.