Adaptive Multi-Layer Electronic Documents for Legal Accessibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing natural language processing systems struggle with managing complex transactional documents that require adaptive layering based on user expertise and interaction events, especially in handling diverse languages and legal terminology.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing large language models (LLMs) for adaptive multi-layer electronic content management, which organizes documents into layers of varying complexity and displays appropriate layers based on user expertise and interaction events, generating summaries and additional documents as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If documents are presented in full legal detail, then completeness and accuracy are improved, but user understanding and accessibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument completenessVSAvoiduser understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments legal documents into multiple layers of detail: a simplified summary layer for general understanding and a detailed legal layer for complete information. Users can navigate between layers based on their expertise level, allowing the system to maintain document completeness while improving accessibility through selective presentation of information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of information density in different sections of the document interface. Summary portions use simplified language for accessibility, while detailed legal portions maintain full terminology and precision. This allows simultaneous optimization of both understanding and completeness in different regions of the same document presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If documents are simplified for lay persons, then accessibility and understanding are improved, but legal precision and completeness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidlegal precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability by detecting user expertise level through interaction events and automatically adjusting the document presentation between simplified and detailed versions. The system can dynamically switch between summary mode for lay persons and full legal mode for experts, ensuring appropriate precision is delivered to each user type without manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (summary/generated content) that bridges the gap between complex legal text and user understanding. This intermediary layer translates legal terminology into plain language while maintaining accuracy, allowing users to comprehend documents without losing legal precision. The intermediary can be expanded upon request to reveal full legal details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple document versions are maintained, then adaptability to user needs is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser adaptationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested document structure where summary versions are embedded within the framework of full legal documents. The summary layer contains references to and can expand into detailed legal portions, creating a nested hierarchy that allows the system to present simplified views without maintaining completely separate document versions. This reduces system complexity while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary generation of summary versions and key information extractions before user interaction. By pre-processing documents to create simplified layers and identify important sections, the system reduces the computational complexity required during actual user interactions. The heavy lifting of document analysis is done in advance, allowing quick adaptation to different user expertise levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If extensive review periods are required, then document accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis and accuracy verification of documents before they are presented to users. Machine learning models pre-process documents to identify key terms, extract essential information, and validate accuracy. This preliminary action ensures document reliability is established upfront, eliminating the need for extended review periods during user interaction while maintaining high accuracy standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250307529A1Adaptive multi-layer electronic content management
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250307529A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307529A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307529A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Adaptive multi-layer electronic content management is provided. A system includes a processor coupled to a memory that that includes instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to receive an electronic document. The processor can determine an interaction event for at least one section of the electronic document. The processor can also determine an expertise level of a user of the electronic document based on the interaction event. The processor can assign a rule to the at least one section based on the interaction event and the expertise level of the user and implement an action to the at least one section of the electronic document based on a determination that the interaction event has occurred and the rule.