Adaptive Drilling Parameter Control for Tool Wear and Hole Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drilling tools are often replaced prematurely due to fixed drilling parameters, leading to waste and reduced quality of holes, as they wear out unevenly, and existing machines lack effective monitoring and adaptation of drilling forces.

Innovation Solution

A method and machine that monitor and adapt drilling torque and thrust forces in real-time, adjusting rotational and feed speeds based on wear to extend tool life, maintain quality, and reduce waste by using sensors to calculate adaptive factors for subsequent drilling operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fixed predetermined drilling parameters are used throughout the tool life span, then the drilling process is simple to operate, but the drilling tool life span is reduced and quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling process simplicityVSAvoiddrilling tool life span
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed predetermined drilling parameters to dynamic parameters that adapt in real-time based on monitored drilling forces. The system continuously adjusts rotational speed and feed rate according to actual tool wear conditions, making the drilling process adaptive rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining operational simplicity through automation while extending tool life span through wear-based parameter adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by monitoring drilling forces (torque and thrust) during the drilling process and using this information to adjust drilling parameters. The system measures actual drilling forces, compares them against reference values, and automatically modifies rotational speed and feed rate accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism extends tool life span while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If fixed predetermined drilling parameters are used, then the drilling machine structure is simple, but the hole quality consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling machine structureVSAvoidhole quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing adaptive drilling parameters that change based on real-time force monitoring. The system dynamically adjusts rotational speed and feed rate according to actual tool wear, maintaining hole quality consistency throughout the tool life span. This resolves the contradiction by using automated dynamic control to maintain precision without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring drilling forces and using this information to adjust parameters that affect hole quality. The system measures torque and thrust, compares them against reference values, and automatically modifies drilling parameters to maintain consistent hole quality. This feedback mechanism ensures manufacturing precision while keeping the overall device structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If drilling parameters are not adapted to tool wear, then the drilling process is efficient and fast, but the drilling tool wears faster and may fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoiddrilling tool reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing adaptive drilling parameters that respond to actual tool wear conditions. The system maintains high productivity by adjusting parameters optimally throughout tool life, while preventing tool failure through wear-based adaptation. This resolves the contradiction by using dynamic parameter control to balance efficiency and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by monitoring drilling forces and using this information to adjust parameters that affect both productivity and tool reliability. The system measures actual drilling forces, compares them against reference values, and automatically modifies rotational speed and feed rate to maintain optimal cutting conditions. This feedback mechanism extends tool reliability while preserving drilling efficiency through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Duration of action of moving object

If drilling parameters are adapted in real-time based on wear, then the drilling tool life span is extended, but the drilling process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling tool life spanVSAvoiddrilling process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by monitoring drilling forces and automatically adjusting parameters to extend tool life span. The system measures torque and thrust, compares them against reference values, and modifies drilling parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism extends tool life while keeping process complexity manageable through automated control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the drilling system to automatically adjust its own parameters based on monitored forces. The system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment without external intervention, extending tool life span while minimizing the complexity of external control systems. The drilling machine essentially monitors and adapts itself autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Duration of action of moving object

If manual monitoring of drilling forces is implemented, then the drilling tool life span can be extended, but the operation becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling tool life spanVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feedback by continuously monitoring drilling forces and automatically adjusting parameters to extend tool life span. The system eliminates manual monitoring by using sensors and control algorithms to perform real-time force measurement and parameter adaptation. This resolves the contradiction by automating the life-extending process, maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the drilling system to automatically monitor its own forces and adjust parameters without human intervention. The system performs self-monitoring and self-adjustment, extending tool life span while maintaining operational simplicity. The drilling machine essentially manages its own wear and parameter optimization autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12048968B2Device and method for drilling with automatic drilling parameters adaptation
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 AIRBUS OPERATIONS SL
  • US12048968B2 patent drawing
  • US12048968B2 patent drawing
  • US12048968B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drilling machine and a drilling method including drilling a first bore in a material with a drilling machine by applying a torque to a drilling tool for imparting a rotation at a first rotational speed to the drilling tool, and applying a thrust to the drilling tool for advancing the drilling tool at a first feed speed into the material, wherein a drilling parameter is measured while drilling the first bore, and a second rotational speed and a second feed speed are determined based on the drilling parameter, then drilling a second bore at the second rotational speed and at the second feed speed.