Adaptive Driver Alert Modality Selection for ADAS Inattention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Driver inattention poses a significant risk in vehicles equipped with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), as automation can lead to decreased driver engagement, necessitating more effective alert methods to maintain safety.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle computing device receives situational and driver state information to select an alert modality from a range of options, such as visual, auditory, or haptic alerts, based on historical behavior records and real-time reactions, optimizing alert effectiveness by considering the driver's emotional and attention levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automation of driving increases, then driver attention levels decrease, but safety requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of drivingVSAvoiddriver attention levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driver state through sensors (cameras, microphones, seat sensors) and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust alert modalities. Driver attention levels are measured and fed back to the alert selection system, which modifies alert behavior based on real-time driver state, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing driver conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The alert system transitions from static, predetermined alert behaviors to dynamic, adaptive alert selection. The system dynamically adjusts which alert modality to use based on real-time driver state assessment, situational context, and historical effectiveness data, making the alert behavior flexible and responsive to changing conditions rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple alert modalities are available, then alert effectiveness can be optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alert system is segmented into distinct modalities (visual alerts, auditory alerts, haptic alerts) that can be independently selected and controlled. Each modality is a separate component with specific characteristics, allowing the system to choose the most appropriate segment for the current situation rather than using a single complex alert mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains a historical behavior record that automatically learns from past alert outcomes and driver responses. This self-learning mechanism reduces the need for manual configuration and complex control logic by allowing the system to automatically optimize alert selection based on accumulated experience, effectively making the system self-adjusting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If alerts are tailored to individual driver preferences, then driver receptivity improves, but processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver receptivityVSAvoidprocessing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of driver state and situational context before selecting an alert modality. By evaluating driver attention levels, emotional state, and current situation in advance of needing to alert the driver, the system prepares the optimal alert selection beforehand, reducing processing demands during critical alert moments and improving response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11926259B1Alert modality selection for alerting a driver
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 ARRIVER SOFTWARE LLC
  • US11926259B1 patent drawing
  • US11926259B1 patent drawing
  • US11926259B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include systems and methods that may include receiving situational information triggering a need to alert the driver and in response to the need to alert the driver presenting an alert to the driver based on driver state information selected based on a likelihood the driver will be more receptive to the alert modality than others of the plurality of alert modalities. The likelihood the driver will be receptive to the alert modality may be based on the received situational information, the received driver state information, and a historical behaviour record. The historical behaviour record may correlate the driver's reaction or the reaction of other drivers to previous alerts presented to the driver or other drivers with similar driver state information and similar situational information triggering presentation of previous alerts. The system may learn from the reaction of the driver and/or other drivers to better select suitable alert modalities.