Adaptive Driver Warning Modes Based on Driver State Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional advanced driver assist systems (ADAS) fail to provide adaptive warnings tailored to the driver's state and situation, often issuing ineffective warnings, such as visual warnings when the driver is not looking forward or auditory warnings when they have hearing impairments.

Innovation Solution

A driver assist device equipped with a processor and sensors that detect outdoor and indoor vehicle information, determining a warning mode based on the driver's state and traveling situation to output appropriate warnings, such as visual, auditory, or tactile alerts, adjusting according to the driver's attention and environmental noise levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a predefined warning form is output when a warning-requiring situation occurs, then the warning system is simple and reliable, but the warning is not adaptive to the driver state and traveling situation, reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The warning system dynamically adjusts the warning form (visual, auditory, tactile) based on real-time driver state detection and traveling situation analysis. The controller selects different warning modes depending on whether the driver is looking forward, their attention level, and environmental conditions, making the system adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the detector continuously monitors driver state (gaze direction, attention level) and the controller adjusts the warning output based on this feedback. This creates a closed-loop system that adapts to changing conditions, improving warning effectiveness while maintaining manageable complexity through systematic decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple warning modes (visual, auditory, tactile) are used adaptively, then the warning effectiveness improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning effectivenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The warning system is segmented into distinct warning modes (visual, auditory, tactile) that can be independently selected and activated. Each warning mode operates through separate output channels, allowing the controller to choose the most appropriate mode based on driver state without requiring all modes to operate simultaneously, thus managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The warning system is designed with multi-functionality, where a single warning generation mechanism can produce multiple types of warnings (visual, auditory, tactile) based on different conditions. This universal approach allows one system to serve multiple purposes, reducing the need for entirely separate warning systems for each mode and thereby controlling overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system detects driver state and traveling situation to determine warning mode, then the warning adaptability improves, but the information processing requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning adaptabilityVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and classification of driver state (e.g., determining if the driver is looking forward or their attention level) before generating warnings. By pre-processing and categorizing the detected information, the system reduces the complexity of subsequent decision-making and information processing during actual warning events, improving adaptability while managing information load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11738683B2Driver assist device and adaptive warning method thereof
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11738683B2 patent drawing
  • US11738683B2 patent drawing
  • US11738683B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driver assist device and an adaptive warning method thereof are provided. The driver assist device includes a processor and a non-transitory storage medium containing program instructions executed by the processor. The processor detects outdoor and indoor information of a vehicle using a detector and determines a warning mode based on a traveling situation and a driver state identified through the detector when a warming-requiring situation is recognized during an operation of a driver assist function. A warning is then output based on the determined warning mode.