Adaptive Driving Behavior Monitoring for Load Fragility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for monitoring driving behavior do not adapt to the fragility of the load being transported, failing to dynamically adjust thresholds for warning alerts and harsh event detection based on changing load conditions during a route.

Innovation Solution

A cloud-based management server system that determines and updates driving behavior parameter thresholds based on a fragility indicator of the load, allowing for real-time monitoring and adaptation of driver behavior to ensure safe handling of varying load types and conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional fixed thresholds are used for monitoring driving behavior, then the monitoring system is simple to implement, but it cannot adapt to varying load fragility conditions during different portions of a route

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdaptability to load fragilityVSAvoidMonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system dynamically adjusts driving behavior thresholds based on the fragility of the load being transported. Different threshold levels are applied during different portions of the route depending on whether fragile or non-fragile goods are being carried, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions without requiring multiple separate monitoring systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter values (thresholds) for driving behavior monitoring based on the fragility indicator of the load. When fragile goods are detected, more stringent thresholds are applied; when non-fragile goods are transported, relaxed thresholds are used, optimizing both safety and system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If dynamic threshold adjustment based on load fragility is implemented, then detection accuracy of harsh events is improved, but the system complexity increases due to real-time monitoring requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDetection accuracy of harsh eventsVSAvoidReal-time monitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system receives information about the load to be transported in advance and determines the appropriate fragility indicator before the vehicle departs. Based on this preliminary information, the monitoring thresholds are pre-configured for different route portions, eliminating the need for complex real-time adjustments during vehicle operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system continuously receives data about vehicle location and load conditions, comparing actual driving behavior against the predetermined thresholds for each route portion. This feedback mechanism enables accurate detection of harsh events while maintaining system simplicity through pre-established criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If monitoring thresholds are adjusted based on load information, then safety for fragile goods is improved, but additional information processing requirements increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSafety for fragile goodsVSAvoidInformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Load information including fragility indicators is received and processed before the vehicle begins its route. The system pre-determines which portions of the route require enhanced monitoring based on this advance information, allowing safety measures to be implemented without requiring complex real-time decision-making during vehicle operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The route is divided into multiple portions with different monitoring requirements based on the load fragility. Each portion has its own predetermined thresholds, allowing the system to process information in manageable segments rather than requiring complex continuous analysis of the entire route simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10196071B1Method and apparatus for monitoring driving behavior of a driver of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 SAMSARA INC
  • US10196071B1 patent drawing
  • US10196071B1 patent drawing
  • US10196071B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for automatically monitoring driving behavior of a driver of a vehicle, are described. Information pertaining to one or more loads to be transported by vehicles is received. One or more first driving behavior parameter thresholds are determined based at least in part on a first fragility indicator of a load to be transported by the vehicle during a first portion of a route. The first fragility indicator is determined at least in part based on the information pertaining to the one or more loads. The driving behavior of the driver of the vehicle is caused to be monitored during the first portion of the route based on the one or more first driving behavior parameter thresholds.