Adaptive Driving Control Using TTC to Avoid Unnecessary Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driving control systems perform unnecessary braking based on simplistic headway distance measurements, failing to account for relative speed and time to collision (TTC), leading to non-dangerous situations being misinterpreted as hazardous.

Innovation Solution

A driving control apparatus that utilizes sensors to identify driving situations, including TTC, timegap, and relative speed, and selectively performs braking control based on threshold comparisons, switching between coasting and braking modes to optimize deceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If braking control is activated based on simple headway distance measurement, then collision risk avoidance is improved, but unnecessary braking occurs in non-dangerous situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk avoidanceVSAvoidunnecessary braking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used for risk assessment from simple headway distance to multiple parameters including TTC (time to collision), relative speed, and headway distance. By incorporating these additional parameters, the system can more accurately distinguish between dangerous and non-dangerous situations, thereby reducing unnecessary braking while maintaining collision avoidance capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors multiple parameters (TTC, relative speed, headway distance) and uses feedback from these measurements to dynamically adjust braking control decisions. This multi-parameter feedback mechanism allows the system to make more accurate real-time decisions about when braking is truly necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple parameters (TTC, relative speed, timegap) are used for risk assessment, then braking accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the risk assessment process into distinct computational steps: calculating headway distance from sensor data, computing TTC based on relative speed and distance, determining timegap, and then comparing these separate parameters against thresholds. This segmentation makes the complex multi-parameter system more manageable and implementable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12539847B2Driving control apparatus and a method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12539847B2 patent drawing
  • US12539847B2 patent drawing
  • US12539847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving control apparatus includes a sensor device, a memory, and a controller. The driving control apparatus identifies at least one of a driving situation of an ego vehicle, driving information of the ego vehicle, or any combination thereof, using the sensor device; performs coasting control of the ego vehicle based on a first driving mode, when the at least one of the driving situation, the driving information, or the any combination thereof meets a specified condition; identifies risk information including at least one of at least one time to collision (TTC), a timegap with a forward vehicle, a relative speed to the forward vehicle, or any combination thereof; and determines whether to switch a driving mode to a second driving mode or a third driving mode including braking control, based on the result of comparing the risk information with a threshold.