Automated Earthmoving Control Using Adaptive Digging Styles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated work vehicles are unable to perform all variations of repetitive earthmoving tasks efficiently, leading to operator fatigue and high operating costs due to their limitations in adapting to different worksite requirements.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automatically performing earthmoving operations using a work vehicle with an articulable implement, controlled by a controller to follow preset styles, including implement-fill and earth-breaking styles, and equipped with vision-based sensors to monitor and adjust operations, allowing for precise control and monitoring of the earthmoving process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated work vehicles use applied forces and efficiency calculations for repetitive tasks, then productivity is improved, but adaptability to different worksite requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation efficiencyVSAvoidworksite requirement adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operational parameters by transitioning between multiple predefined styles (earth-breaking, implement-fill, layer-centric, depth-centric) based on real-time worksite conditions. This dynamic style selection enables the automated vehicle to adapt its behavior patterns to match different earthmoving requirements while maintaining automated efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different predefined styles that represent distinct operational modes. Each style contains specific parameter configurations for stroke length, digging depth, fill patterns, and emptying behaviors. By changing between these parameter sets, the system adapts to various worksite requirements without sacrificing automated productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If work vehicles perform repetitive earthmoving tasks manually, then adaptability to worksite requirements is maintained, but operator fatigue increases and operating costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworksite requirement adaptationVSAvoidoperator fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation by allowing the work vehicle to autonomously select and execute appropriate operational styles based on worksite conditions. The predefined styles contain all necessary operational parameters, enabling the vehicle to perform adaptive earthmoving tasks without continuous operator intervention, thereby eliminating operator fatigue while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary action by pre-defining multiple operational styles with optimized parameters for different earthmoving scenarios. These predefined styles are prepared in advance and can be automatically selected based on worksite requirements, eliminating the need for operators to manually adjust parameters during operation and reducing fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If automated vehicles use single operational mode, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity across varied tasks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidtask completion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by implementing a multi-functional control architecture that can execute multiple predefined operational styles through a single unified controller. The controller selects from earth-breaking, implement-fill, layer-centric, and depth-centric styles based on task requirements, enabling one device to perform diverse earthmoving functions without requiring separate specialized systems for each task type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3896231B1System and method for automatically performing an earthmoving operation
Publication Date: 2024.07.17 CNH IND ITALIA SPA
  • EP3896231B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3896231B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3896231B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A system for automatically performing an earthmoving operation may include a work vehicle having an implement that is articulable by the work vehicle over a stroke length, a user interface, and a controller communicatively coupled to the user interface. The controller may be configured to receive an operator input via the user interface associated with performing an earthmoving operation with the implement of the work vehicle according to one of a plurality of earthmoving styles. Additionally, the controller may be configured to control the operation of the work vehicle to perform the earthmoving operation with the implement within the worksite based at least in part on the one of the plurality of earthmoving styles.