Adaptive ECG Triggering for T-Wave-Safe Ablation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ablation systems fail to account for individualized cardiac cycle timing and morphology, potentially leading to incorrect therapy delivery during vulnerable periods of the cardiac cycle, such as the T-wave, which can induce arrhythmias.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive ablation system that analyzes cardiac signals to identify safe windows for therapy delivery by adjusting timing based on cardiac rate and incorporating double-checks for accurate detection of cardiac cycles, using techniques like slew rate analysis and confirmation of R-waves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed delay interval is used after R-wave detection to deliver ablation therapy, then the system operation is simple, but the therapy timing may coincide with vulnerable cardiac periods (T-wave) causing arrhythmias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of therapy timingVSAvoidsafety of therapy delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the therapy delivery timing based on real-time analysis of cardiac cycle morphology. Instead of using a fixed delay interval, the system continuously monitors ECG signals and adapts the safe window parameters (start time, duration) to match the patient's specific cardiac rhythm characteristics, ensuring therapy is delivered only during safe periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by continuously analyzing cardiac signals and using this information to adjust therapy timing. The analysis means processes ECG data to identify R-waves and estimate T-wave timing, then feeds this information back to the trigger means to determine optimal therapy delivery windows, creating a closed-loop safety system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If therapy timing is adjusted to account for individualized cardiac cycle characteristics, then the safety of therapy delivery is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of therapy deliveryVSAvoidcomplexity of timing adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes key parameters (safe window start time and duration) based on analyzed cardiac cycle characteristics. By calculating these parameters dynamically from ECG morphology and cardiac rate, the system adapts to individual patient variations without requiring complex hardware modifications, achieving personalized safety through software-based parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system continuously monitors and adjusts therapy timing based on real-time cardiac analysis, then the accuracy of safe window identification is improved, but the processing time and system resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of safe window detectionVSAvoidtime for cardiac signal analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of cardiac cycles to establish baseline parameters and patterns before therapy delivery. By pre-calculating safe window parameters based on analyzed cardiac morphology and rate characteristics, the system reduces real-time processing requirements during actual therapy delivery, balancing accuracy with speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4138695B1Adaptive ECG triggering in an ablation system
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED INC
  • EP4138695B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4138695B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4138695B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and devices for issuing ablation therapy using a cardiac signal as a trigger for therapy delivery. The cardiac signal itself may be analyzed before and/or between pulsed electrical field outputs to determine when, relative to fiducials within the cardiac signal, the output can safely be delivered. In some examples, the timing of therapy delivery is tailored to the patient's current cardiac state, such as the cardiac rate. In other examples, triggering signals can be analyzed to ensure that the trigger itself is appropriately detected.