Adaptive ECG Signal Sampling for High-Frequency Waveform Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical signal sampling systems uniformly process all portions of medical signals at high sampling rates, leading to over-sampling and redundant data acquisition, especially for low-frequency components, resulting in inefficient use of resources and potential delays in data transmission and processing.

Innovation Solution

A patient monitoring signal processing system that uses nonlinear and non-uniform data sampling, with an adaptive sampling clock to adjust sampling rates based on the varying frequency components of medical signals, such as ECG signals, optimizing data acquisition by increasing sampling rate during high-frequency portions (like the QRS complex) and reducing it during low-frequency portions (like the T wave), using a control processor to determine the appropriate sampling frequencies and number of A/D converters needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If uniform high sampling rate is used for all portions of medical signals, then measurement precision is maintained, but productivity decreases due to over-sampling and redundant data acquisition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal sampling accuracyVSAvoiddata acquisition efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the sampling rate based on the instantaneous frequency content of the medical signal. During high-frequency portions (e.g., QRS complex), the sampling rate is increased to capture critical features, while during low-frequency portions (e.g., T wave), the sampling rate is reduced. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by maintaining measurement precision when needed while improving productivity during less critical periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sampling rate parameter is changed adaptively according to the signal characteristics. The system monitors the signal frequency content and modifies the sampling rate parameter in real-time, transitioning between high and low sampling rates based on detected signal portions. This parameter change strategy allows the system to achieve both high measurement precision during critical events and high productivity during routine periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If high sampling rate is used for all signal portions, then reliability of signal capture is improved, but loss of energy increases due to resource-intensive processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal capture accuracyVSAvoidprocessing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic sampling rate adjustment that activates high sampling rates only during detected high-frequency signal portions and uses lower sampling rates during low-frequency portions. This dynamic approach ensures reliable capture of critical signal features while minimizing energy consumption during less critical periods, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sampling rate parameter is adaptively changed based on signal analysis results. When the detector identifies high-frequency components requiring reliable capture, the system increases the sampling rate; otherwise, it reduces the rate to conserve energy. This parameter modulation strategy achieves both reliable signal capture and reduced energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If uniform high sampling rate is applied to all medical signals, then measurement precision is maintained, but device complexity increases due to resource-intensive data compression and transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal sampling accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the sampling rate to match the actual signal requirements, using high rates only when necessary for accurate capture and lower rates otherwise. This reduces the volume of data requiring compression and transmission, thereby simplifying the overall device complexity while maintaining measurement precision during critical events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the sampling rate parameter based on signal characteristics, the system reduces the amount of data that needs to be processed, compressed, and transmitted. This parameter adaptation directly lowers the complexity of downstream processing systems while preserving measurement precision when high sampling rates are applied to critical signal portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If high sampling rate is used for all signal portions, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to data transmission delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal sampling accuracyVSAvoiddata transmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sampling rates to match signal needs, using high rates during critical high-frequency portions and lower rates during less critical periods. This reduces the total data volume requiring transmission, thereby decreasing transmission delays while maintaining measurement precision during critical events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By adaptively changing the sampling rate parameter based on signal frequency content, the system minimizes data transmission volume without compromising precision during critical periods. This parameter modulation reduces overall transmission time and delays while preserving measurement accuracy when high sampling rates are applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7876251B2System for processing patient monitoring signals
Publication Date: 2011.01.25 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US7876251B2 patent drawing
  • US7876251B2 patent drawing
  • US7876251B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A patient monitoring signal processing system adaptively varies medical signal data rate. The system uses an analog to digital converter for digitizing an analog cyclically varying input signal derived from a patient in response to a sampling clock input. The sampling clock determines frequency of analog to digital sampling of the analog input signal by the analog to digital converter. A detector detects first and second different signal portions within a cycle of the cyclically varying input signal. A control processor coupled to the analog to digital converter and the detector, provides the sampling clock and adaptively determines first and second different frequencies of the sampling clock to be used in sampling within detected corresponding first and second different signal portions of the cyclically varying input signal in response to predetermined information indicating a frequency of a signal component of the cyclically varying input signal in the first signal portion is higher than a frequency of a signal component of the cyclically varying input signal in the second signal portion. Also the first frequency is higher than the second frequency of the first and second different frequencies.