Adaptive Effective C-Rate Charging Prevents Lithium Saturation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lithium-ion battery charging methods, such as CCCV and I-V-T, either operate blindly or charge unnecessarily slowly due to over-conservative estimates, and require difficult-to-manufacture three-electrode cells, failing to adapt to changes in diffusion time caused by temperature, age, and manufacturing variations.

Innovation Solution

The Adaptive Effective C-rate Charging (AECC) method calculates an effective C-rate using battery voltage and state-of-charge, allowing for dynamic adaptation of charging current and voltage to prevent lithium surface saturation, extending battery life without needing three-electrode cell characterization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If constant-current constant-voltage (CCCV) charging method is used, then charging simplicity is maintained, but charging speed is limited due to worst-case assumptions and inability to adapt to battery characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidcharging control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring battery voltage and state-of-charge, and adjusting the charging current based on the calculated effective C-rate. The controller compares the actual battery state with target values and dynamically modifies charging parameters to optimize charging speed while preventing lithium surface saturation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static charging parameters to dynamic parameter adjustment. The effective C-rate is continuously recalculated based on real-time battery voltage and state-of-charge measurements, allowing the charging current to adapt dynamically to changing battery characteristics during the charging process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If adaptive surface concentration charging (ASCC) is used, then lithium surface saturation is prevented, but charging speed decreases due to over-conservative estimates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelithium surface saturation preventionVSAvoidcharging speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from conservative voltage-based estimation to effective C-rate calculation. By computing the effective C-rate based on actual battery voltage and state-of-charge, the system achieves more accurate adaptation to battery conditions, allowing faster charging while still preventing lithium surface saturation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical constraint of three-electrode cell characterization with an electrical calculation approach. Instead of requiring physical reference electrodes and complex cell construction, the effective C-rate is calculated electronically from voltage and state-of-charge measurements, achieving similar adaptive control without the manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If three-electrode cell characterization is performed, then accurate battery dynamics are obtained, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery dynamics characterization accuracyVSAvoidcell manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for charging control from the complex three-electrode characterization process. By calculating the effective C-rate from standard two-electrode battery measurements (voltage and state-of-charge), the system obtains the necessary battery dynamics information without requiring the insertion of reference electrodes or specialized cell construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a mathematical model (effective C-rate calculation) that replicates the functionality of three-electrode cell characterization using readily available two-electrode measurements. This virtual model captures the essential battery dynamics without requiring physical modifications to the battery cell structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

AECC charges batteries quickly while preventing lithium surface saturation, adapting to temperature, aging, and manufacturing variations, and does not require complex three-electrode cell characterization, thus extending battery life and optimizing charging times.

Implementation Method 1

the net effect is dominated by a slow diffusion process for filling one electrode with lithium and another diffusion process for removing lithium from the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS9559543B2Adaptive effective C-rate charging of batteries
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 APPLE INC
  • US9559543B2 patent drawing
  • US9559543B2 patent drawing
  • US9559543B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed embodiments provide a system that manages use of a battery in a portable electronic device. During operation, the system obtains a voltage of the battery and a state-of-charge of the battery. Next, the system calculates an effective C-rate of the battery using the voltage and the state-of-charge. Finally, the system uses the effective C-rate to manage a charging process for the battery.