Adaptive Visual Tracking via Incremental Eigenbasis Update

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional visual tracking algorithms fail to adapt to changes in object appearance and environment, leading to instability and drift, especially under conditions of large lighting variations and pose changes.

Innovation Solution

An iterative tracking method using an Eigenbasis representation that incrementally updates the object description, incorporating a dynamic model for motion prediction and an observation model for appearance evaluation, with an inference model for location prediction and Eigenbasis update, allowing for robust tracking under varying conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional visual tracking algorithms are used, then tracking can be performed in well-controlled environments, but the algorithms fail to adapt to changes in object appearance and environment, leading to instability and drift

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking stabilityVSAvoidadaptation to appearance changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static object models to dynamic models that continuously adapt. The Eigenbasis is incrementally updated using new observations, allowing the model to dynamically adjust to changing appearance, lighting conditions, and pose variations while maintaining tracking stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where observation models continuously evaluate the current image against the Eigenbasis, and the inference model uses this feedback to update the dynamic model. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to adapt to appearance changes while maintaining reliable tracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If static models of the target object are built, then the model structure remains simple, but the algorithms are prone to instability when encountering drastic changes in appearance or lighting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel structure complexityVSAvoidtracking reliability under variation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system evolves from static to dynamic modeling by incrementally updating the Eigenbasis with new observations. This allows the model to capture temporal variations in appearance, lighting, and pose while maintaining a manageable structure through subspace projection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by updating the Eigenbasis vectors and covariance matrix over time. The dynamic model adjusts parameters such as mean and covariance based on new observations, enabling the system to adapt to changing conditions without requiring complete model reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the Eigenbasis is updated incrementally, then the system can adapt to appearance changes in real-time, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time adaptation capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by updating only the necessary portions of the Eigenbasis rather than recomputing the entire basis from scratch. The incremental update mechanism adjusts the subspace projection based on new observations, achieving real-time adaptation with reduced computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7463754B2Adaptive probabilistic visual tracking with incremental subspace update
Publication Date: 2008.12.09 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US7463754B2 patent drawing
  • US7463754B2 patent drawing
  • US7463754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method are disclosed for adaptive probabilistic tracking of an object within a motion video. The method utilizes a time-varying Eigenbasis and dynamic, observation and inference models. The Eigenbasis serves as a model of the target object. The dynamic model represents the motion of the object and defines possible locations of the target based upon previous locations. The observation model provides a measure of the distance of an observation of the object relative to the current Eigenbasis. The inference model predicts the most likely location of the object based upon past and present observations. The method is effective with or without training samples. A computer-based system provides a means for implementing the method. The effectiveness of the system and method are demonstrated through simulation.