Adaptive E-Learning Proficiency Estimation via Probabilistic Parameter Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adaptive e-learning technologies fail to provide detailed learner diagnosis, leading to difficulties in identifying incorrect answers due to guessing or missing responses, and require all learners to take the same test for accurate proficiency estimation.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for personalized adaptive e-learning that estimates learner proficiency by initializing item parameters and prior probabilities, calculating conditional likelihood, and updating parameters based on individual item answering results, allowing for accurate diagnosis even when learners do not take the same test.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If adaptive e-learning technologies rely on correlation between contents or merely count incorrect items to diagnose learner characteristics, then the system is simple to operate, but the diagnosis precision is insufficient and cannot identify cases of guessing or mistakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the diagnosis approach by changing from simple counting methods to probabilistic parameter estimation. It introduces item parameters (difficulty, discrimination, guessing probability) and learner parameters (attribute proficiency) that are estimated through maximum likelihood estimation, enabling precise diagnosis of learner characteristics while accounting for guessing and mistakes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary diagnostic model that connects learner responses to attribute proficiency. The cognitive diagnosis model acts as a mediator, using item response theory and probability calculations to infer latent learner attributes from observed responses, thereby achieving precise diagnosis without directly measuring attributes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the archetypal cognitive diagnosis model is used to estimate learner proficiency, then the diagnosis can be detailed for each attribute, but reliable results can be obtained only when a large number of learners have taken the exact same test

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproficiency estimation accuracyVSAvoidpersonalized learning adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the diagnostic system dynamic by allowing item parameters and learner parameters to be estimated simultaneously through iterative maximum likelihood estimation. The system adapts to personalized learning scenarios where different learners take different items, updating parameter estimates as new response data becomes available, rather than requiring fixed test administrations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary initialization of item parameters and prior probabilities before the actual diagnosis process. This preliminary setup enables the system to handle personalized learning scenarios from the start, providing a foundation for accurate proficiency estimation even when learners take different tests

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If traditional adaptive e-learning systems count the number of incorrect items to diagnose weak attributes, then the method is easy to implement, but it cannot distinguish between genuine knowledge gaps and incorrect answers due to guessing or mistakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribute diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical counting method with a probabilistic calculation system. Instead of simply counting incorrect items, it uses maximum likelihood estimation and probability models to evaluate the likelihood of different attribute proficiency patterns, thereby distinguishing between genuine knowledge gaps and guessing behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where item parameters (including guessing probabilities) and learner parameters are continuously refined based on response patterns. The system uses the calculated likelihoods and posterior probabilities to feedback and update parameter estimates, improving the accuracy of attribute diagnosis over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10733899B2Apparatus and method for providing personalized adaptive e-learning
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US10733899B2 patent drawing
  • US10733899B2 patent drawing
  • US10733899B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for providing personalized adaptive e-learning, and more specifically, to an apparatus and method for estimating a learner's proficiency to each attribute and providing adaptive e-learning by taking into consideration an item answering result of an individual learner in a personalized learning environment.