Elevator call allocation with adaptive multi-objective optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional elevator control systems struggle to optimize waiting times and transit times effectively, especially during varying traffic conditions, as they often prioritize one objective over the others, leading to inefficiencies and potential saturation during heavy traffic.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an adaptive multi-objective optimization system that dynamically adjusts weights for waiting time and transit time objectives based on current passenger traffic indicators, using sigmoid functions and exponential smoothing to optimize elevator call allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If a pure waiting time objective is used to minimize average waiting time, then waiting time is reduced, but handling capacity decreases and the system saturates sooner during heavy traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaverage waiting timeVSAvoidhandling capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the objective function adaptive rather than static. The controller dynamically adjusts the weighting between waiting time minimization and handling capacity based on real-time traffic conditions. During light traffic, the system prioritizes waiting time reduction, while during heavy traffic, it shifts focus to maximizing handling capacity, thus resolving the contradiction between these two opposing goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the objective function based on traffic conditions. By monitoring traffic indicators and adjusting the weight coefficients in the multi-objective function, the system transitions between different optimization priorities. This parameter adaptation allows the system to achieve both short waiting times and high handling capacity under different operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a pure time to destination objective is used to maximize handling capacity, then handling capacity increases, but waiting time optimization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling capacityVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches optimization priorities based on traffic intensity. When traffic is light, the controller emphasizes waiting time minimization. When traffic becomes heavy, it transitions to prioritizing time to destination and handling capacity, thus adaptively resolving the contradiction between these two objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller adjusts the weight parameters in the objective function according to traffic conditions. By changing these parameters dynamically, the system can shift focus between waiting time optimization and handling capacity maximization, achieving both goals under different operational scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If fixed weight optimization is used, then the objective function is simple, but it cannot adapt to varying traffic conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjective function complexityVSAvoidadaptability to traffic conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring traffic indicators and using this information to adjust the objective function weights. The controller receives feedback about current traffic conditions and adapts its optimization strategy accordingly, enabling the system to respond dynamically to changing operational environments while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250214807A1Elevator call allocation with adaptive multi-objective optimization
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 KONE OYJ
  • US20250214807A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214807A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214807A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, methods and computer programs for elevator call allocation with adaptive multi-objective optimization are disclosed. At least some of the disclosed embodiments may allow adaptively and smoothly changing an objective function according to passenger traffic. This in turn may allow minimizing waiting times in all traffic situations compared to using a fixed objective function. Furthermore, at least some of the disclosed embodiments may allow adaptively and smoothly changing the objective function according to the traffic while taking user preferences into consideration via a single transit time target parameter.