Adaptive Endocardial Acceleration Signal Averaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for processing endocardial acceleration signals in active implantable medical devices face a compromise between precision and speed of response, leading to noise contamination and reduced representation of heart mechanics, especially due to cycle-to-cycle variability and the risk of introducing atypical cycles in averaging processes.

Innovation Solution

A device with dynamic adaptation capabilities that modifies processing parameters and validation criteria based on detected changes in patient state or events, such as heart rate instability or apnea, to optimize the averaging of endocardial acceleration signals, ensuring accurate and timely representation of heart mechanics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the EA signal is averaged over a large number of cycles to improve precision, then measurement precision is improved, but the speed of response deteriorates due to the increased time constant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of averaged EA signalVSAvoidspeed of response
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the number of cycles N used for averaging variable rather than fixed. The processing means dynamically adapt N based on detected patient state or events, increasing N when precision is prioritized and decreasing N when rapid response is needed, thus resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and speed of response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter N (number of cycles for averaging) from a constant to a variable parameter that can be modified in response to detected changes in patient state. This allows the system to optimize the trade-off between precision and response speed by adjusting N according to clinical needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the averaging is calculated over a low number of cycles to improve speed of response, then speed of response is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to noise contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of responseVSAvoidprecision of averaged EA signal
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of cycles N used for averaging based on the detected patient state. When rapid response is needed, N is reduced to improve speed of response, while when precision is prioritized, N is increased to reduce noise contamination through more extensive averaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The parameter N is modified from a fixed low value to a variable parameter that can be increased when precision is needed and decreased when speed is needed, allowing the system to adapt to different clinical situations and resolve the contradiction between speed and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If validation criteria are made rigorous to improve precision, then measurement precision is improved, but the quantity of processed cycles deteriorates due to rejection of atypical cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of averaged EA signalVSAvoidnumber of retained cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The validation criteria are made dynamic rather than fixed, allowing the system to adjust the strictness of cycle acceptance based on detected patient state. When precision is prioritized, more rigorous criteria are applied, and when maintaining adequate cycle quantity is needed, criteria are relaxed to include more cycles in the averaging process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The validation thresholds and criteria parameters are modified based on detected events or patient state, allowing the system to balance between precision (stricter criteria) and quantity of retained cycles (more lenient criteria) according to clinical needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2499971B1Device for adaptive processing of an endocardial acceleration signal
Publication Date: 2015.12.30 SORIN CRM
  • EP2499971B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2499971B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP2499971B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

The device includes means for continuously acquiring an endocardial acceleration (EA) signal, with: segmentation into EA sub-signals, each over the duration of a cardiac cycle; separation of the EA1 and EA2 components; intercorrelation between the EA sub-signals of each component and temporal registration with respect to a reference cycle; application of a series of validation criteria; and averaging to deliver an overall average EA signal over one cycle. It also includes detection means (24) capable of detecting a change in the patient's state or the occurrence of a predetermined event in the patient, and means (26, 28) for dynamically adapting the treatment means, capable of modifying, upon detection of this change in state or predetermined event, at least one of the aforementioned validation criteria and/or at least one of the parameters of the treatment means.