Adaptive Energy Storage Operating System for Multi-Service Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy storage systems lack an efficient and adaptive software solution to optimize and manage multiple value streams, failing to effectively coordinate components and integrate with various energy services and devices.

Innovation Solution

A modular software operating system that includes adaptive energy computing modules, device drivers, libraries, and applications to optimize energy storage systems based on external signals and operator preferences, enabling communication, data transformation, and control across energy storage devices and networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a modular software operating system with adaptive energy computing modules is implemented, then the system can optimize and manage multiple value streams and coordinate components effectively, but the device complexity increases due to the modular architecture including drivers, libraries, and applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to optimize and manage multiple value streamsVSAvoidmodular architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The software operating system is divided into distinct modular components including energy computing modules, device drivers, libraries, and applications. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently developed, deployed, and maintained. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity through organized modularity while maintaining the ability to optimize multiple value streams through coordinated module interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The energy operating system is designed as a universal platform that can manage multiple energy storage devices and coordinate various energy services through a common architecture. The modular design with standardized interfaces enables the system to handle diverse energy storage technologies and multiple value streams (economic services) without requiring separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the operating system integrates with various energy storage devices and services, then the ease of operation improves through automated management, but the device complexity increases due to integration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated management capabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The energy operating system acts as an intermediary layer between energy storage devices and the management interface. Device drivers serve as specific intermediaries that translate between device-specific protocols and the universal operating system interface. This intermediary architecture enables automated management and coordination of multiple devices and services while encapsulating integration complexity within the driver layer, protecting the upper-level applications from device-specific complexities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated rule-based algorithms that enable self-service optimization of energy storage operations. The energy computing modules automatically analyze pricing signals, communications signals, rate structures, and system status to generate optimal operational decisions without requiring constant manual intervention. This automation improves ease of operation while the modular architecture manages the underlying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If adaptive rules and algorithms are used to optimize energy storage operation based on external signals, then the productivity improves through optimized energy management, but the device complexity increases due to the computational requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy management optimizationVSAvoidcomputational algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs pre-configured rule-based algorithms that are established in advance for optimizing energy storage operations. These algorithms incorporate predetermined logic for responding to pricing signals, rate structures, and system conditions. By having rules prepared beforehand rather than requiring complex real-time computation for every decision, the system achieves productive optimization while managing computational complexity through pre-planned decision frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The energy operating system continuously monitors system status, pricing signals, and operational outcomes, using this feedback to adjust and optimize energy storage operations. The adaptive rules incorporate feedback loops where system performance is constantly evaluated and operational parameters are adjusted accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables productive optimization through data-driven decisions while the modular rule-based architecture manages the complexity of computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10409241B2Adaptive energy storage operating system for multiple economic services
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 HANWHA SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US10409241B2 patent drawing
  • US10409241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides an adaptive energy storage operating system that is programmed or otherwise configured to operate and optimize various types of energy storage devices.