Multiyear Energy System Planning via Adaptive Year-Level Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Microgrid and Distributed Energy Resources (DER) project planning methods fail to effectively consider multiple-year forecasts of grid conditions, technology, fuel, electricity pricing, regulatory constraints, and climate conditions, leading to unrealistic assumptions and significant economic and environmental risks due to the inability to accurately model and optimize long-term scenarios within a reasonable time frame.

Innovation Solution

A fast multiyear projection planning method using optimization, simulation, or modeling that applies projection factors to input data to represent expected future conditions, allowing for optimal asset selection, sizing, and dispatch across an infinite number of years, utilizing machine learning and cloud-based platforms to reduce computational complexity and improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the forward-looking approach is used to model, simulate, or optimize the entire time horizon simultaneously, then future conditions are properly considered, but the time required increases non-linearly with the number of years

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of multiyear planningVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multiyear optimization problem into individual year-level optimization problems. Each year is solved separately using the adaptive method, where the system state is updated iteratively from one year to the next. This segmentation reduces computational complexity from exponential growth to linear scaling with the number of years, while still capturing future conditions through the adaptive updating mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If stochastic elements are added to hedge against uncertainty, then robustness against forecast errors improves, but the number of decisions to be made increases, further increasing runtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness to forecast uncertaintyVSAvoidnumber of decision variables
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from stochastic optimization (adding probabilistic elements and multiple scenarios) to adaptive deterministic optimization. Instead of modeling uncertainty through multiple stochastic scenarios, the adaptive method uses updated system states and forecasts for each year, achieving robustness through temporal adaptation rather than probabilistic multiplication of decision variables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If simplifications are employed to combat time increase, then computational speed improves, but the reality of economic planning is distorted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoidaccuracy of economic planning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics into the optimization process by allowing the system state to adapt and evolve from year to year. Rather than using static simplifications that freeze parameters, the adaptive method dynamically updates forecasts, system states, and optimization results for each year, maintaining economic planning accuracy while achieving computational efficiency through sequential rather than simultaneous solving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of time

If only a single year is solved with constant conditions assumed (SYO), then computational time is reduced, but input data is frozen for the entire project lifetime which is unrealistic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational timeVSAvoidability to handle changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by iteratively solving year-level optimization problems and updating the system state continuously from one year to the next. This continuous adaptation allows the system to capture changing future conditions over the entire project lifetime, unlike single-year optimization that freezes data, while maintaining computational efficiency through sequential solving rather than simultaneous multiyear optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20230419228A1Machine learning based multiyear projection planning for energy systems
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 XENDEE CORP
  • US20230419228A1 patent drawing
  • US20230419228A1 patent drawing
  • US20230419228A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning based multiyear projection planning for energy systems is disclosed. In some embodiments, a method comprises: obtaining input data for an energy system; determining one or more projection factors based on the input data; determining, based on a machine learning model, an operation or investment associated with the energy system to achieve lower cost or improve one or more metrics of the energy system for the multiyear horizon based at least in part on the one or more projection factors and a description of technology or infrastructure of the energy system; generating a recommended operation or investment decision for the energy system based at least in part on output of the machine learning model; and storing the recommended operation or investment decision.