Adaptive Evacuation Rules for Dynamic Route Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emergency evacuation plans in facilities are often static and difficult to update, lacking real-time adaptability and effectiveness, particularly in large and complex environments, and do not account for current occupant locations, leading to potential congestion and panic during emergencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adaptive cause and effect rules using artificial intelligence to dynamically modify evacuation strategies based on site-specific conditions, incorporating data from fire drills and real-time occupancy information to optimize evacuation routes and prevent bottlenecks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static evacuation plans are used, then implementation is simple, but adaptability to real-time conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to real-time conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static evacuation plans into dynamic ones by implementing real-time modification capabilities. The system continuously updates evacuation routes and strategies based on current occupancy data, emergency location, and simulated drill results, allowing the evacuation plan to adapt dynamically to changing conditions rather than remaining fixed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms through fire drills and occupancy monitoring. Results from simulated evacuations and real-time occupancy data feed back into the system to continuously improve and adjust evacuation plans, creating a closed-loop system that learns from past performance and adapts to new conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If detailed tracking of occupant locations is implemented, then evacuation effectiveness improves, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation effectivenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-service mechanisms through automated occupancy tracking and analysis. Rather than requiring manual intervention to monitor and update evacuation plans, the system automatically collects occupancy data, analyzes drill results, and adjusts evacuation strategies without human intervention, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual evacuation planning and monitoring with automated computational systems. Machine learning algorithms and automated data processing systems substitute for manual analysis of occupancy patterns and drill results, reducing the need for human expertise while improving the speed and accuracy of evacuation plan optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If frequent updates to evacuation plans are made, then adaptability improves, but time and resources for maintenance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation plan adaptabilityVSAvoidtime for plan updates
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-simulating various emergency scenarios through fire drills and pre-processing occupancy data. This allows the system to have evacuation plans ready in advance for different situations, reducing the time needed for updates when actual emergencies occur by having pre-computed strategies available

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous operation by running occupancy tracking and drill simulations continuously rather than in discrete batches. This continuous data collection and analysis allows for seamless updates to evacuation plans without interrupting facility operations, maintaining adaptability while minimizing disruption and time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240346344A1Adaptive cause and effect rules for emergency evacuation
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20240346344A1 patent drawing
  • US20240346344A1 patent drawing
  • US20240346344A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and devices for adaptive cause and effect rules for emergency evacuation are described herein. One method includes performing a plurality of fire drills at a facility having a fire control panel, receiving data associated with each of the plurality of fire drills, and modifying cause and effect rules stored and implemented by the fire control panel based on the received data.