Adaptive Exercise Advice System Preventing User Fatigue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing devices for providing sports advice to users generate advice based on user proficiency, leading to repetitive advice if proficiency remains unchanged, which may be insufficient and demotivating for users.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device with a goal setting unit, advice generation unit, motivation estimation unit, and evaluation unit, which sets exercise goals, generates advice, estimates user motivation, and evaluates motivation based on exercise data, adjusting advice accordingly to maintain user engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If advice is generated based on user proficiency, then the advice is personalized to user capability, but the advice becomes repetitive and insufficient when proficiency remains unchanged

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdvice adaptabilityVSAvoidAdvice variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the advice generation system adaptive and responsive to changing user states. The advice generation unit dynamically adjusts advice content based on real-time motivation estimation, transforming a static proficiency-based system into a dynamic one that evolves with user motivation levels, thereby preventing advice repetition and maintaining user engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by introducing a closed-loop system where user motivation is continuously estimated, evaluated, and fed back to the advice generation unit. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust advice based on user response and motivation changes, ensuring advice remains varied and relevant rather than repetitive, thus resolving the contradiction between personalization and variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If the same advice is continuously generated based on unchanged proficiency, then the system maintains consistency, but user motivation decreases due to advice fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdvice consistencyVSAvoidAdvice fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by introducing regular motivation estimation and evaluation cycles. The system periodically reassesses user motivation and adjusts advice accordingly, creating rhythmic variations in advice delivery that prevent monotony and advice fatigue while maintaining overall system stability and consistency in its adaptive approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying advice generation based on motivation parameter variations. When motivation levels change, the system adjusts advice parameters (content, timing, frequency) to prevent advice fatigue, thereby maintaining consistency in the adaptive mechanism while varying the actual advice delivered to keep users engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If motivation estimation and evaluation functions are added to the system, then advice variety and user engagement improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdvice personalizationVSAvoidSystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing the information processing device to perform multiple functions within integrated units. The advice generation unit simultaneously handles advice creation and motivation-based adaptation, while the evaluation unit consolidates motivation assessment and advice adjustment functions, reducing overall system complexity despite enhanced personalization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements merging by combining related functions into unified components. The motivation estimation unit and evaluation unit work as an integrated subsystem that feeds into the advice generation unit, creating a cohesive structure that reduces complexity compared to separate independent modules, while still achieving sophisticated advice personalization based on motivation analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250140366A1Information processing device and program storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US20250140366A1 patent drawing
  • US20250140366A1 patent drawing
  • US20250140366A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device includes a goal setting unit configured to set a first goal for an exercise of a subject, an advice generation unit configured to generate a first advice for the first goal, an output unit configured to output the first goal and the first advice, a motivation estimation unit configured to estimate a motivation of the subject, and an evaluation unit configured to evaluate a motivation of the subject for the first goal. The advice generation unit generates a second advice different from the first advice based on a result of the evaluation by the evaluation unit, and the output unit outputs the second advice.