Adaptive Feedback Loop Gain Control for Active Noise Reduction Instability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Feedback-based active noise reduction systems are prone to instability due to variations in the acoustic path, particularly when the earbud tip is blocked, leading to oscillations and potential hearing damage from ambient noise.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive system that detects instability by monitoring the feedback loop gain and phase margin, using an oscillation detector to adjust the loop gain and mitigate oscillations, and a blocked tip detector to adjust acoustic impedance, ensuring stable operation and effective noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback based active noise reduction is implemented, then noise reduction effectiveness is improved, but system stability deteriorates due to potential oscillations from acoustic path variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction effectivenessVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors its own output and adjusts the loop gain accordingly. The feedback path includes an acoustic component that is measured and used to adjust the feedback loop gain, ensuring stability while maintaining noise reduction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the loop gain based on real-time detection of acoustic path variations. When instability is detected through monitoring feedback loop characteristics, the system automatically modifies the loop gain to prevent oscillations, making the stability characteristics adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If loop gain is increased to improve noise reduction, then noise cancellation performance is improved, but oscillation risk increases due to potential instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise cancellation performanceVSAvoidoscillation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback monitoring to detect when high loop gain settings are approaching instability thresholds. The feedback path provides real-time information about the acoustic transfer function, allowing the system to adjust the loop gain downward before oscillations occur, thus maintaining high performance without the harmful oscillations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action by detecting early signs of instability through the feedback path before actual oscillations occur. By monitoring the feedback loop gain and acoustic transfer function in advance, the system adjusts the loop gain proactively to prevent oscillations rather than reacting after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If acoustic path variations are allowed for natural operation, then system adaptability is improved, but instability increases due to feedback loop gain variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic path adaptabilityVSAvoidfeedback loop stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows acoustic path variations to occur naturally for adaptability while dynamically adjusting the loop gain to compensate for these variations. The feedback mechanism continuously monitors the acoustic transfer function and modifies the loop gain in real-time, enabling the system to adapt to different acoustic environments while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the loop gain parameter in response to detected acoustic path variations. By monitoring the feedback loop characteristics and adjusting the loop gain parameter dynamically, the system maintains stability across different acoustic conditions without restricting natural acoustic path changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively stabilizes the feedback loop, reducing noise perception and preventing hearing damage by quickly reacting to disturbances and variations in the acoustic path, consuming minimal power, and being immune to audio signals.

Implementation Method 1

a feedback microphone to measure a feedback sound pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic measurement: Sound

Implementation Method 2

an acoustic driver to produce an output sound wave in response to a modified version of an input signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic transduction: Sound

Implementation Method 3

the two sound waves cancel one another due to destructive interference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDestructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentEP2834994B1Instability detection and avoidance in a feedback system
Publication Date: 2018.11.14 BOSE CORP
  • EP2834994B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2834994B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2834994B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A feedback based active noise reduction system is configured to detect actual or potential instability by detecting characteristics of the system related to potential or actual unstable behavior (e.g., oscillation) and adapt system characteristics to mitigate such instability.