Adaptive Feedback System for Ballistic Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Combat and high-precision situations require enhanced accuracy and decision-making, but human physical and emotional stressors can impair these abilities, necessitating technological assistance for improved effectiveness and safety.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive feedback system mounted on firearms, utilizing machine learning algorithms to analyze and predict shooter eye and hand movements, and providing real-time haptic, visual, and auditory feedback to enhance accuracy, along with an optional automatic firing mechanism for increased safety and effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human shooters operate firearms in combat situations, then the system is simple and responsive, but accuracy deteriorates due to physical and emotional stressors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multiple feedback mechanisms including haptic feedback through the grip, visual feedback via display elements showing projected shot landing, and auditory feedback through speakers. This closed-loop feedback allows shooters to adjust their aim in real-time, compensating for stress-induced accuracy degradation without requiring complex manual calculations or training

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus introduces an intermediary computational system that processes sensor data about shooter movements and firearm trajectory, then provides guidance through multiple channels. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of stress compensation algorithms, shielding the shooter from the complexity while maintaining simple operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 3:

The system integrates multiple functions into a single apparatus: movement sensing, trajectory calculation, multi-channel feedback provision, and optional automatic firing control. This consolidation manages complexity by providing comprehensive accuracy enhancement through one unified system rather than multiple separate devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If an adaptive feedback system with machine learning is added to improve accuracy, then ballistic precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshot placement accuracyVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning algorithm operates autonomously, continuously analyzing sensor data about shooter movements and automatically adjusting trajectory predictions without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously processing data and providing feedback, reducing the operational complexity for the user while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of projected shot landing locations before the shooter fires, using machine learning to predict trajectories based on detected movements. This advance computation allows the system to provide proactive guidance rather than reactive correction, improving precision while managing complexity through pre-processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If real-time multi-channel feedback is provided to enhance situational awareness, then decision-making ability improves, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback selectively based on situational needs rather than continuously at full capacity. The machine learning algorithm determines when and what type of feedback is necessary, providing partial action only when needed for accuracy enhancement. This reduces unnecessary computational energy consumption while maintaining situational awareness when required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Different feedback channels (haptic, visual, auditory) are activated locally based on specific situational requirements and user preferences. The system adjusts the quality and intensity of each feedback type according to the specific context, optimizing energy usage by not activating all channels simultaneously unless absolutely necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If automatic firing mechanism is implemented to enhance safety and effectiveness, then operational safety improves, but loss of human control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidhuman control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The firing control system is dynamic and adaptable, allowing the shooter to adjust the level of automation based on situational needs and personal preference. The system can operate in fully manual mode, semi-automated mode with suggestions, or fully automated mode, providing flexibility that maintains human control when desired while enabling safety enhancements when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250130018A1Apparatus for an adaptive feedback system for enhancing ballistic accuracy
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 COVENTRY III ROBERT JOHN
  • US20250130018A1 patent drawing
  • US20250130018A1 patent drawing
  • US20250130018A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present variations disclose an apparatus or system configured to provide adaptive feedback for increasing ballistic accuracy in combat and high-precision situations. The apparatus utilizes machine learning algorithms to analyze and predict the movement of a shooter's eyes and hands when firing a weapon while continually monitoring the movements of the firearm to improve accuracy. The apparatus also utilizes a haptic, visual, and auditory feedback mechanism that provides real-time guidance and feedback on projected shot landing to enhance situational awareness and accuracy in high-stress environments. The apparatus may also include an automatic firing mechanism that enables the system to take over firing when appropriate via a human-guided mechanism to further enhance safety and effectiveness.