Adaptive Filter Maximum Stable Gain Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for measuring maximum stable gain in hearing assistance devices, such as hearing aids, are inadequate in accurately determining the gain before acoustic feedback occurs, which is crucial for optimal programming and user experience.

Innovation Solution

The system employs adaptive filtering techniques, including LMS, NLMS, FIR, and Wiener filters with variable step sizes, to calculate maximum stable gain as a function of frequency by injecting noise into the hearing assistance device's processing channel and using adaptive filters to cancel acoustic feedback, allowing for precise determination of gain limits across different frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If adaptive filtering techniques are used to measure maximum stable gain, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum stable gain measurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a virtual acoustic feedback canceller that copies the feedback path characteristics through adaptive filtering. Instead of physically measuring the complex feedback loop directly, the system creates a mathematical model (copy) of the feedback path using the adaptive filter coefficients, thereby simplifying the measurement process while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct physical measurement of acoustic feedback with signal processing techniques. By substituting the mechanical/acoustic measurement approach with digital signal processing (adaptive filtering, FFT analysis), the system achieves more precise measurements while reducing the complexity of physical setup and measurement infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple adaptive filters with variable step sizes are employed, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegain measurement accuracyVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting and switching between different adaptive filter algorithms (LMS, NLMS, FIR, Wiener) based on convergence characteristics. The variable step size mechanism automatically adjusts the filtering parameters without user intervention, allowing the system to optimize measurement precision while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by allowing the step size and filter coefficients to change automatically during operation. The system dynamically adjusts the adaptive filtering parameters based on real-time convergence behavior, enabling precise measurements while keeping the user interface simple as the complexity is managed internally through dynamic parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2136575B1System for measuring maximum stable gain in hearing assistance devices
Publication Date: 2020.10.07 STARKEY LABORATORIES INC
  • EP2136575B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2136575B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2136575B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

This disclosure relates generally to measurement of maximum stable gain of a hearing assistance device, including but not limited to hearing aids, as a function of frequency. In various approaches an adaptive filter with a variable step size is used to determine maximum stable gain as a function of frequency. In various approaches, the determination is done in process steps performed by the hearing assistance device. In various approaches, the determination is done in process steps performed by the hearing assistance device and by a host computer.