Adaptive Filter Deterministic Gradient Descent Signal Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing EW receivers face challenges in quickly and effectively classifying uncooperative or unknown signals in real-time operations due to the low signal-to-noise ratio and the need for vast computation iterations with stochastic optimization methods.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive filter system utilizing a deterministic gradient descent optimization logic and interpolation logic, which includes a first processing loop for initial parameter extraction and a second processing loop for refining match filter parameters to achieve efficient signal classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If stochastic optimization methods are used for signal classification, then computation speed is improved, but classification accuracy deteriorates due to requiring vast computation iterations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation speedVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into two distinct loops: a first processing loop for initial parameter extraction and coarse classification, and a second processing loop for refined parameter optimization. This segmentation allows the system to achieve quick initial results while maintaining the option for higher precision when needed, resolving the contradiction between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic switching between different optimization approaches based on operational requirements. The system can operate in the faster stochastic optimization mode when speed is prioritized, and switch to the more accurate deterministic gradient descent mode when classification precision is critical, allowing adaptive adjustment of the speed-accuracy tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If vast computation iterations are performed to improve classification accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal classification accuracyVSAvoidreal-time processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The first processing loop performs preliminary parameter extraction and initial classification before the second loop refines the results. This preliminary action provides a head start on the classification process, reducing the number of iterations needed in the second loop to achieve high accuracy, thereby maintaining real-time processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial optimization by focusing the second processing loop only on refining specific match filter parameters that most impact classification accuracy, rather than re-optimizing all parameters. This partial action achieves high precision with fewer iterations, preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If deterministic gradient descent optimization is used instead of stochastic optimization, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidcomputation algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies deterministic gradient descent optimization locally and selectively to specific match filter parameters in the second processing loop, rather than applying complex optimization to all parameters throughout the entire system. This localized application maintains measurement precision for critical parameters while limiting the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250055737A1Interpolated deterministic gradient adaptive filter
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION ANDELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC
  • US20250055737A1 patent drawing
  • US20250055737A1 patent drawing
  • US20250055737A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An adaptive filter protocol stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium that is operatively in communication with a processor of a platform. The adaptive filter protocol includes a first processing loop that is operatively in communication with at least one receiving device of the platform for receiving at least one input signal. The adaptive filter protocol also includes a second processing loop that is operatively in communication with the first processing loop and has a deterministic gradient descent optimization logic and an interpolation logic. When the at least one receiving device receives the at least one input signal, the adaptive filter protocol enables the processor to generate a refined match filter parameters that substantially correlates with the initial parameters of the at least one input signal upon completing a plurality of refining cycles of the second processing loop.