Adaptive Forage Cutting Length Based on Fiber Composition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing forage cutting processes are not adaptable to the type and quality of forage, leading to inefficient energy use, variable digestibility, and suboptimal fiber length selection that affects animal health and production efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A process that measures specific parameters like aNDF/lignin ratio, uNDF240, and leaf-to-stem ratio to determine optimal cutting lengths for different forage types, using NIR spectrometry for precision, and adjusts cutting times based on these parameters to enhance digestibility and ruminant activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If forage is cut to a fixed length regardless of type, then the cutting process is simple and fast, but digestibility varies and ruminant activity is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidfiber length optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting length is made dynamic and adaptable based on forage characteristics. The system determines optimal cutting length by measuring forage parameters (leaf-to-stem ratio, aNDF, lignin content) and adjusting the cutting length accordingly, rather than using a fixed length for all forage types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the cutting length parameter based on measured forage properties. By measuring parameters like leaf-to-stem ratio, aNDF, and lignin content, the system adjusts the cutting length parameter to optimize digestibility and ruminant activity for each specific forage type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If forage cutting time is extended to improve digestibility, then fiber length and digestibility are optimized, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigestibility optimizationVSAvoidcutting energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of forage characteristics (leaf-to-stem ratio, aNDF, lignin content) before cutting to determine the optimal cutting length in advance. This allows the cutting process to be optimized from the start, avoiding unnecessary extended cutting times and associated energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements a feedback mechanism where measured forage parameters (leaf-to-stem ratio, aNDF, lignin content) are used to determine and adjust the cutting length. This feedback loop ensures that cutting time and energy are optimized based on actual forage characteristics rather than using fixed, potentially excessive cutting times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If forage parameters are measured precisely to determine optimal cutting length, then digestibility and ruminant activity are optimized, but measurement complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting length precisionVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with optical/NIR (Near Infrared) measurement technology. This allows for rapid, non-contact measurement of forage parameters (leaf-to-stem ratio, aNDF, lignin content) without complex mechanical handling or preparation, reducing both measurement time and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses NIR spectroscopy as an intermediary method to indirectly measure forage composition parameters. Instead of directly measuring complex chemical compositions, the NIR technique provides rapid estimation of leaf-to-stem ratio, aNDF, and lignin content, simplifying the measurement process while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If cutting length is reduced to improve digestibility, then fiber breakdown is enhanced, but ruminant activity stimulation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedigestibilityVSAvoidruminant activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention adjusts the cutting length parameter dynamically based on measured forage characteristics. By considering parameters like leaf-to-stem ratio and lignin content, the system determines an optimal cutting length that balances digestibility enhancement with adequate fiber length to maintain ruminant chewing activity and overall reliability of the feeding system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process ensures precise and efficient cutting of forage to optimize digestibility and stimulate ruminant activity, reducing energy waste and improving animal health and production efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

measures specific parameters like aNDF/lignin ratio, uNDF240, and leaf-to-stem ratio to determine optimal cutting lengths for different forage types, using NIR spectrometry for precision

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNIR spectrometry: Absorption Spectroscopy

Data Source

PatentEP4162790B1Process for cutting a forage for animal feed
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 FARESIN INDS
  • EP4162790B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Process for cutting a forage for farm animals, which comprises a step of arranging at least one dose of forage and a first step of measuring a first parameter (PI) indicative of the quantity of indigestible fiber contained in the dose of forage. In addition, the process comprises a first step of comparing the first parameter (PI) with a discrimination value (D), which identifies at least one first composition interval (11), with a first cutting length (LI) associated therewith, and a second composition interval (12), with a second cutting length (L2) associated therewith. In addition, in the first comparison step with the first parameter (PI) in the first composition interval (11), the first cutting length (LI) is selected; and with the first parameter (PI) in the second composition interval (12), the second cutting length (L2) is selected. The process also comprises a first step of setting a target cutting length (Lf), determined as a function of at least one between the first cutting length (LI) and the second cutting length (L2) selected, in a cutting apparatus, and a first cutting step, in which the cutting apparatus is actuated with the dose of forage at its interior in order to obtain a dose of cut forage.