Adaptive Support Garment Lacing for Activity-Based Fit Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing support apparel, such as bras and tights, lack adaptability to dynamically adjust to different activity levels, leading to suboptimal fit and functionality during varying physical activities.

Innovation Solution

Integration of activity sensors, such as IMUs and GPS, with a control circuit that communicates with an adaptive engine to automatically adjust lacing systems in garments, providing customizable support based on detected activity levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If support apparel is designed with minimal adjustments for size and body type, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different activity levels and body contours deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to activity levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustability through motorized lacing systems that can automatically or manually adjust support levels. The lacing mechanism allows the garment to transition from a static minimal-adjustment design to a dynamic system that adapts to different activity levels, body contours, and support requirements, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support apparel integrates multiple functions including automatic sensing of activity levels, motorized adjustment mechanisms, and manual override capabilities. This multi-functional design allows a single garment to serve multiple purposes across different activities and preferences, maintaining manufacturing feasibility while achieving versatile adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual adjustment mechanisms are provided, then ease of operation is improved, but extent of automation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual adjustabilityVSAvoidautomatic adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors that automatically detect activity levels and trigger motorized adjustments without user intervention. The garment serves itself by sensing its own operational context and making appropriate support adjustments, achieving high automation while preserving manual adjustment options for user preference or exceptional circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustment system is designed to be dynamic, switching between automatic and manual modes based on user needs. The motorized mechanism can operate autonomously based on sensor input or be manually controlled, providing flexibility that resolves the contradiction between automation and manual operability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple garments are provided for different activities, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and loss of time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity-specific supportVSAvoidtime for garment changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal garment that can adapt to multiple activities through integrated sensing and motorized adjustment systems. Instead of requiring separate garments for different activities, this single multi-functional garment detects activity type and automatically adjusts support characteristics, eliminating the need for garment changes and reducing time loss while maintaining adaptability across activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The garment dynamically reconfigures its support properties based on detected activity levels and types. This dynamic adaptation allows one garment to replace multiple activity-specific garments, resolving the contradiction between versatility and time efficiency by enabling real-time adjustments rather than requiring physical garment changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3975782B1Adaptive support apparel systems and methods
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 NIKE INNOVATE CV
  • EP3975782B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3975782B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3975782B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Systems and apparatus related to adaptive support garments including adaptive support structures, lacing systems, and an adaptive engine are discussed. In an example, an adaptive support apparel system includes an activity sensor, an adaptive support garment, and a control circuit. The activity sensor monitors activity of a user. The adaptive support garment includes an integrated adaptive support system coupled to the adaptive engine to automatically adjust a portion of the adaptive support garment through manipulation of the adaptive support system. The control circuit configured to send commands to the adaptive engine in response to input received from the activity sensor.