Adaptive Garbage Collection Engine for SSD Memory Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional memory management techniques, such as garbage collection (GC), fail to adapt effectively to varying host access patterns, leading to inefficient use of memory resources, reduced device lifespan, and compromised user experience in SSDs.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive GC engine that tunes GC aggressiveness based on host access patterns, such as idle periods, and a dynamic SLC cache that reallocates memory cells between SLC and MLC storage, optimizing memory utilization and extending device lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional garbage collection is performed continuously, then memory resources are reclaimed, but device lifespan is reduced due to excessive write cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory resource availabilityVSAvoiddevice lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The garbage collection engine dynamically adjusts its operation based on host access patterns. When the host is active, GC operations are reduced or paused. When the host is idle, GC operations are intensified. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to reclaim memory resources when needed while minimizing unnecessary write cycles during host activity, thereby extending device lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of GC aggressiveness based on host activity state. During host activity, GC aggressiveness is reduced; during idle periods, GC aggressiveness is increased. This parameter adjustment optimizes the balance between memory resource availability and device lifespan by performing reclamation operations primarily during idle periods when host performance is not impacted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If SLC cache size is increased to improve write performance, then more memory cells are allocated to SLC, but MLC storage capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite performanceVSAvoidMLC storage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The SLC cache size is dynamically adjusted based on host access patterns and GC engine activity. When GC operations are intensified during idle periods, the SLC cache size can be temporarily reduced as GC reclaims space in MLC. When host write performance is critical, the SLC cache size is increased to buffer writes. This dynamic allocation optimizes both write performance and total storage capacity utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary GC operations during idle periods before host activity resumes. By reclaiming MLC space in advance during idle periods, the system reduces the need for large SLC cache allocations during subsequent host activity, thereby maintaining MLC storage capacity while still ensuring write performance when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If garbage collection aggressiveness is increased to free memory space, then memory availability improves, but write amplification increases reducing device endurance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory availabilityVSAvoiddevice endurance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The garbage collection engine operates periodically during host idle periods rather than continuously. This periodic operation allows the system to accumulate and reclaim memory space in batches during idle times, improving memory availability without causing continuous write amplification that would reduce device endurance. The periodic nature synchronizes GC operations with natural pauses in host activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The GC engine monitors host access patterns and adjusts its aggressiveness accordingly. When the host is active, GC aggressiveness is reduced to minimize write amplification. When the host is idle, GC aggressiveness is increased to free up memory space. This feedback mechanism ensures that GC operations improve memory availability while minimizing negative impact on device endurance by adapting to actual system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11561892B2Garbage collection adapted to user device access
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11561892B2 patent drawing
  • US11561892B2 patent drawing
  • US11561892B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for adapting garbage collection (GC) operations in a memory device to a pattern of host accessing the device are discussed. The host access pattern can be represented by how frequent the device is in idle states free of active host access. An exemplary memory device includes a memory controller to track a count of idle periods during a specified time window, and to adjust an amount of memory space to be freed by a GC operation in accordance with the count of idle periods. The memory controller can also dynamically reallocate a portion of the memory cells between a single level cell (SLC) cache and a multi-level cell (MLC) storage according to the count of idle periods during the specified time window.