Adaptive Glucose Alert Escalation Across Volume and Modality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing diabetes management devices often fail to deliver alerts effectively due to suboptimal volume settings, leading to missed alerts in loud environments or unnecessary battery depletion, and may not account for user-specific conditions or device malfunctions, resulting in potential health risks and unnecessary battery drain.

Innovation Solution

A user device that customizes alert intensity and modality based on user-specific criteria, environmental noise levels, and previous user responses, gradually increasing alert volume and modality (auditory, visual, haptic) until acknowledged, and switches to alternative devices if necessary, to ensure timely notification of critical alerts and device issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If alert volume is increased to ensure user hears alerts in loud environments, then alert effectiveness is improved, but battery power is depleted faster

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoidbattery power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The alert system dynamically adjusts the volume level based on environmental noise conditions and user response patterns. The volume is not fixed but changes over time, starting at a lower level and increasing only when necessary based on whether the user acknowledges the alert, thereby balancing effectiveness with energy conservation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user responses to alerts are monitored and used to adjust future alert behavior. If a user does not respond to an initial low-volume alert, the system increases volume for subsequent alerts, creating a feedback mechanism that optimizes both effectiveness and power consumption based on actual user behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If alert volume is decreased to be appropriate for quiet environments, then user comfort is improved, but alert effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidalert effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alert volume dynamically adapts to environmental conditions and user needs. In quiet environments, the system starts with lower volume for comfort, but reserves the capability to increase volume if the user does not respond, thus maintaining both comfort and effectiveness through dynamic adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the volume parameter based on environmental context and user response. The volume is not static but is modified according to situational factors, allowing the same alert system to be comfortable in quiet settings while remaining effective when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If alert intensity is increased to ensure user acknowledgment, then response time is improved, but battery depletion accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser response timeVSAvoidbattery power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions at lower intensity levels first, attempting to get user acknowledgment with minimal power consumption. Only if the preliminary low-intensity alert fails to elicit a response does the system escalate to higher intensity, thus achieving quick response when possible while conserving battery power

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The alert intensity is dynamic rather than static, starting low and increasing over time based on user response. This dynamic approach allows the system to achieve fast response times when users are attentive while avoiding unnecessary high-intensity alerts that would waste battery power

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11741798B2Medical device alert, optimization, personalization, and escalation
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 ROCHE DIABETES CARE INC
  • US11741798B2 patent drawing
  • US11741798B2 patent drawing
  • US11741798B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An alert is used to inform a user that their blood glucose level has dropped below a threshold (e.g., the user is hypoglycemic) or has increased above a threshold (e.g., the user is hyperglycemic). There is a hierarchy of alerts from lowest priority to highest priority. The alert is communicated by a user device (e.g., a mobile device), which is, for example, a smartphone, smart watch, home automation device, or the like. The alert is modified in order to increase the likelihood that the user receives or acknowledges the alert within a minimal amount of time. An intensity level (e.g., a volume) of an alert is modified based on, for example, whether the user has acknowledged a previous alert. A modality or a sensory channel of an alert is changed if an initial alert does fails to elicit a response from the user.