Adaptive Glucose Sampling for Faster Insulin Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing diabetes management systems using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) with fixed time intervals are reactive and may miss significant glucose level changes, leading to inaccurate insulin delivery and increased risk of hypo- or hyper-glycemic events due to missed readings.

Innovation Solution

A wearable drug delivery device with a processor that adjusts the frequency of glucose readings based on the rate of change, allowing for more frequent sampling during rapid glucose level changes and enabling quicker insulin delivery adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If fixed time interval readings are used, then power consumption is reduced, but the system becomes less responsive to rapid glucose changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidresponsiveness to glucose changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the reading interval based on the detected rate of change in glucose levels. When rapid changes are detected, the interval decreases to provide more frequent readings and enable quicker insulin delivery adjustments. When glucose levels are stable, the interval increases to conserve power. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between power consumption and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the time interval parameter between readings based on the physiological state detected by the CGM. By adjusting this critical parameter according to the rate of glucose change, the system optimizes the balance between energy efficiency and clinical responsiveness, reading more frequently only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If larger time intervals are used, then power consumption is reduced, but the gap in glucose awareness increases when readings are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidglucose awareness continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reading interval is dynamically adjusted based on the detected rate of glucose change. When rapid changes are detected, the system switches to shorter intervals to maintain continuous glucose awareness and reduce the impact of missed readings. This dynamic adjustment ensures reliability is maintained during critical periods while conserving power during stable periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively increases reading frequency when it detects the onset of rapid glucose changes, before a missed reading could create a significant awareness gap. This preliminary action ensures that the system is in a high-monitoring state when glucose dynamics suggest increased risk, preventing gaps in awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If more frequent readings are taken, then responsiveness to glucose changes improves, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to glucose changesVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic interval adjustment, taking frequent readings only when the rate of glucose change exceeds a threshold indicating clinical significance. During periods of stable glucose levels, the interval increases to conserve power. This dynamic behavior provides high responsiveness only when physiologically necessary, resolving the contradiction between speed and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The time interval parameter is continuously adjusted based on the detected glucose dynamics. The system changes from long intervals during stability to short intervals during rapid changes, optimizing the balance between responsiveness and power consumption by adapting the parameter to actual physiological needs rather than using a fixed value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If fixed interval processing is used, then device complexity is reduced, but the system is more reactive to wider jumps in CGM values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol process complexityVSAvoiddetection accuracy of glucose changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control process dynamically adapts its reading interval based on the detected rate of glucose change, moving from a simple fixed-interval approach to a condition-based adaptive approach. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain simplicity during stable periods while improving measurement precision during rapid changes without requiring complex continuous monitoring algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260069779A1Threshold based automatic glucose control response
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 INSULET CORP
  • US20260069779A1 patent drawing
  • US20260069779A1 patent drawing
  • US20260069779A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a wearable medical device that includes a processor or logic circuitry. The wearable medical device may include a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor or logic circuitry, configure the wearable medical device to determine, by the processor or the logic circuitry, that an event affecting a blood glucose measurement value trend of a user has occurred. Based on the occurrence of the event, the processor or the logic circuitry may select a mode of operation of the analyte sensor, and generate a signal indicating the selected mode of operation. The mode of operation may correspond to a sampling frequency of a physical attribute or physiological condition of a user of the wearable medical device.