Adaptive Golf Scoring With Dynamic Tee Locations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional golf scoring systems fail to accommodate varied skill levels, leading to frustration, slow pace of play, and limited opportunities for strategic decision-making, especially for novice golfers, and do not provide adequate training or recognition for diverse player abilities.

Innovation Solution

A system that calculates a point total based on a golfer's performance, allowing tee locations to be selected relative to the putting green, with a Points Baseline and Performance Factor adjusting scores, enabling players to adjust difficulty levels and encourage strategic play.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional par-based scoring is used, then skilled golfers can achieve low scores, but novice golfers feel frustrated and unable to compete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescoring system adaptabilityVSAvoidplayer satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of scoring from absolute stroke count to relative performance rating. Each hole receives a rating based on the ratio of par to actual strokes, transforming the scoring metric from fixed (par-based) to dynamic (performance-based). This allows players of all skill levels to achieve competitive scores while maintaining the challenge of the course.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The scoring system introduces dynamics by allowing players to adjust their tee location forward or backward based on their skill level and confidence. This dynamic adjustment creates a personalized difficulty level for each player, enabling novices to start closer to the green while skilled players can start from traditional tees, making the game adaptable to individual capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If full 18-hole rounds are played, then complete golf experience is provided, but time consumption increases to 3-4 hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegolfing efficiencyVSAvoidround duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by allowing players to complete only 9 holes instead of the traditional 18, while still providing a complete scoring experience. The performance rating system is designed to work effectively with partial rounds, giving players a sense of accomplishment and competitive scoring without requiring the full time commitment of an 18-hole round.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic tee location adjustment enables players to skip back and forth along the hole based on their performance and confidence, potentially completing holes faster by adjusting starting positions to match their current skill state, thereby reducing overall round duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed tee locations are used, then course integrity is maintained, but strategic decision-making is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrategic flexibilityVSAvoidcourse structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics to the traditionally static tee location by allowing players to move their starting position forward or backward along the hole. This dynamic adjustment provides strategic flexibility for players to adapt to their skill level, weather conditions, and group composition while maintaining the fundamental structure and boundaries of the course.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different players or groups can have different tee locations tailored to their specific needs and skill levels. This local customization allows each player to experience the course at their appropriate difficulty level while maintaining the overall course integrity and design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If players start from traditional tees, then course design is respected, but novice golfers experience increased difficulty and slower pace

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayer accessibilityVSAvoidpace of play
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts tee locations based on player skill level, allowing novices to start closer to the green to reduce difficulty and complete holes faster. This dynamic adjustment improves accessibility for all skill levels while potentially increasing overall pace of play by reducing the time novices spend struggling with difficult shots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the starting position parameter for novice players, moving it forward from the traditional tee location. This parameter change makes the game more accessible to beginners by reducing the distance and difficulty of each hole, while still allowing them to participate in the full golf experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12427396B2System of and method for scoring golf
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 PAR POINTS GOLF LLC
  • US12427396B2 patent drawing
  • US12427396B2 patent drawing
  • US12427396B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for and method of scoring a game of golf is provided. A stroke baseline, a points baseline, and a stroke count are utilized to calculate a hole score for each hole. The stroke baseline is typically derived from the par value for a hole, while the stroke count is typically the total strokes required to complete the hole, including any penalty strokes. Typically, the points baseline for each hole is equal to the distance, in yards, between the player's tee-up location and a target location of the hole, the target location being a location on the putting green. Each player selects a tee-up location for each hole, thereby allowing each player to influence the baseline score for each hole. A performance factor is determined for each hole based on the player's performance on that hole.