Adaptive Gradation Processing for Pupil Division Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image processing technologies lack the ability to adaptively perform gradation processes on images with multiple high-brightness-side gradation distributions during the developing process, particularly for images captured by pupil division type imaging elements, which limits the dynamic range expansion and introduces noise or color artifacts.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that acquires and processes visual point image data with different visual points, allowing for adaptive gradation processes using both first and second processing units to output images with expanded dynamic range while minimizing noise and color distortion, by employing pupil division type imaging elements and dynamic range extension techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a single gradation process is used for developing image data, then the processing is simple and fast, but the dynamic range is limited and high-brightness details are lost due to clipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection between multiple gradation processing methods (first gradation processing and second gradation processing) based on the characteristics of the input image data. The system adaptively switches processing modes to optimize both simplicity and accuracy for different image scenarios, resolving the contradiction between processing complexity and gradation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters by introducing multiple gradation processing methods with different characteristics. The first gradation processing handles normal dynamic range images, while the second gradation processing specifically addresses high-brightness regions with clipped data, allowing the system to achieve higher gradation accuracy without permanently increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple gradation processes are performed on the entire image, then the dynamic range is expanded and high-brightness details are preserved, but processing time increases and computational load becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic rangeVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the second gradation processing only to specific high-brightness image areas where clipping has occurred, rather than processing the entire image. This localized approach preserves dynamic range in critical regions while minimizing unnecessary processing time and computational load on the rest of the image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the image processing into two distinct pathways: first gradation processing for normal regions and second gradation processing for high-brightness regions with clipped data. This segmentation allows the system to apply comprehensive processing only where needed, reducing overall processing time while maintaining expanded dynamic range in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If pupil division type imaging elements are used to capture images with different visual points, then the dynamic range is enlarged, but noise and color artifacts are introduced in the combined image

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic rangeVSAvoidnoise and color artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of clipping in high-brightness regions into a beneficial opportunity by introducing a second gradation processing method specifically designed to handle clipped data. This method recovers high-brightness details that would otherwise be lost, transforming the limitation of single-exposure imaging into an advantage through multi-exposure combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing step (second gradation processing) that acts as a mediator between the first gradation processing results and the final output image. This intermediary process specifically addresses color artifacts and noise by performing additional gradation adjustments on high-brightness regions, thereby reducing harmful effects while preserving the expanded dynamic range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10567722B2Image processing apparatus, image processing method, imaging apparatus, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 CANON KK
  • US10567722B2 patent drawing
  • US10567722B2 patent drawing
  • US10567722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus can acquire a plurality of pieces of visual point image data having different visual points from an imaging element having a pupil division pixel, and perform a gradation process on an image. When there are a plurality of types of high-brightness-side gradation distributions which can be reflected at a developing time, the image processing apparatus displays a user interface screen on a display unit and displays a histogram representing brightness of an image for each high brightness gradation improvement method. An area in which high brightness gradation is adjustable is displayed on a displayed image to be distinguished for each of the high brightness gradation improvement methods and for each setting condition.