Adaptive Shared GUI Layout for Users With Different Abilities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional organizational tools lack customized and adaptable user interfaces that are optimized for the group and individual users associated with them, failing to account for varying physical and cognitive abilities.

Innovation Solution

Shared organization devices that adapt graphical user interfaces by recognizing individual users through inputs or sensors, determining their physical and cognitive abilities, and tailoring display settings to provide ergonomic experiences, including location-based affordances and representation types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single standardized GUI is provided for all users, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to different user abilities deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user abilitiesVSAvoidGUI customization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The GUI dynamically adapts its configuration based on detected user characteristics. The system automatically adjusts affordance locations, information representations, and display parameters in real-time according to the user's physical and cognitive abilities, transforming a static interface into a dynamic one that responds to user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple GUI parameters simultaneously including affordance positions, text sizes, icon representations, and information density based on user profile parameters such as age, height, and cognitive ability. This allows the interface to be optimized for each user without requiring complete redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the GUI is customized for each individual user, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction easeVSAvoidcustomization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically detecting user characteristics and adjusting GUI parameters without requiring manual customization by the user. The device serves itself by making intelligent adjustments based on observed user attributes, eliminating the need for complex user setup procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from user interactions and detected characteristics to continuously optimize the GUI configuration. By monitoring user behavior patterns and physical characteristics, the system adjusts the interface to better suit individual needs, creating a feedback loop that improves ease of operation over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If affordances are positioned for taller users, then ease of operation is improved for that group, but usability deteriorates for shorter users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility for taller usersVSAvoidaccommodation of different heights
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different spatial configurations to different users based on their individual characteristics. Rather than using a single fixed layout, the GUI adjusts affordance positions, display areas, and interaction zones locally for each user according to their height and physical capabilities, ensuring optimal accessibility for each individual.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Quantity of substance

If text-based information is displayed for users with advanced reading skills, then information density is improved, but accessibility deteriorates for users with limited reading ability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation densityVSAvoidaccommodation of cognitive abilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes information representation parameters based on user cognitive abilities. For users with advanced reading skills, the interface displays text-based information with high density. For users with limited reading ability, the system transforms the same information into visual formats such as icons, images, or simplified representations, maintaining adaptability across different cognitive levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12524255B1Systems and methods for customizing a graphical user interface with user-associated display settings
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 HEARTH DISPLAY INC
  • US12524255B1 patent drawing
  • US12524255B1 patent drawing
  • US12524255B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for adapting a shared organization device for different users of a plurality of users includes: identifying a first user of the plurality of users associated with the shared organization device that is interacting with the shared organization device based on a first user input; determining one or more user-associated display settings for the first user based on a physical ability and a cognitive ability of the first user; displaying an interactive user interface of the shared organization device based on the one or more user-associated display settings for the first user, comprising: displaying one or more interactive affordances at a first location of the touch screen display based on the physical ability of the first user, and displaying one or more symbolic representations of one or more tasks assigned to the first user based on the cognitive ability of the first user.