Adaptive Haptic Feedback for Agricultural Machine User Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing user interfaces for agricultural machines lack effective haptic feedback mechanisms, making it difficult for operators to intuitively recognize and distinguish different settings, control demands, and operating states of the machine.

Innovation Solution

A control system for agricultural machines that includes a user interface with a moveable input element, a feedback actuator for inducing haptic feedback, and a control unit that adjusts the force feedback characteristic based on the position difference between the current and target positions of the actuators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If only optical feedback (dial indicators, meters, light indicators) is used to indicate settings and operating states, then the information can be displayed clearly, but the operator cannot intuitively recognize and distinguish different states through tactile sensation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedback informationVSAvoidfeedback actuator system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where a feedback actuator generates haptic forces that are applied to the input element. The control unit continuously monitors the actuator position and adjusts the feedback force accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that provides intuitive tactile feedback to the operator about the current operating state and position differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback actuator serves as an intermediary component that translates electronic control signals into physical haptic forces. This mediator converts abstract position data into tangible tactile sensations that the operator can feel through the input element, bridging the gap between digital information and human perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If haptic feedback is added to the user interface, then operator recognition of settings and states is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional feedback actuators and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator controlVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback actuator is designed to perform multiple functions: it provides haptic feedback for position indication, generates resistance forces for control precision, and communicates operating states through varying force characteristics. This multi-functional approach consolidates several feedback mechanisms into a single component, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts haptic feedback parameters such as force magnitude, frequency, and resistance based on the position difference between the current and target actuator positions. By varying these parameters, the system conveys different information states without requiring additional hardware, thereby managing complexity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If the haptic feedback provides detailed information about position differences, then the operator can distinguish different operating states, but the force feedback characteristic becomes complex to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition difference informationVSAvoidforce feedback control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback system dynamically adapts its characteristics based on real-time position differences. The control unit continuously calculates the difference between current and target positions and adjusts the feedback force accordingly, creating a dynamic response that provides intuitive tactile cues without requiring complex static control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic updates of the haptic feedback force characteristics, synchronizing the feedback with the actuator's movement cycles. This periodic action creates rhythmic tactile patterns that help the operator perceive position differences and operating states through familiar temporal patterns, simplifying the control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables operators to haptically recognize and distinguish different settings and operating states of the agricultural machine by providing intuitive haptic feedback that correlates with the position difference of the actuators, enhancing operator control and machine efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The actuator may be of a magnetorheological type

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetorheological effect: Magnetorheological Fluid

Implementation Method 2

The feedback actuator may be of electric, piezoelectric, magnetic, hydraulic, magnetorheological, electrorheological or of any other type

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic effect: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 3

The feedback actuator may be of electric, piezoelectric, magnetic, hydraulic, magnetorheological, electrorheological or of any other type

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20250147541A1Adaptive Haptic Feedback Control of an User Interface
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 AGCO INT GMBH
  • US20250147541A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147541A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147541A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for controlling an agricultural machine with a user interface and a method of adjusting a haptic feedback of a user interface including method steps for determining a current position of the at least one actuator, determining a target position of the at least one actuator, determining a position difference between the current position and the target position, and adjusting a force feedback characteristic in dependence of the position difference.