Adaptive Haptic Interface Control for Agricultural Machine Settings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing user interfaces for agricultural machines lack effective haptic feedback mechanisms to enable operators to distinctly recognize and differentiate various settings, control demands, and operating states of the machines.

Innovation Solution

A user interface for agricultural machines featuring a moveable input element with a feedback actuator that induces haptic feedback through a force feedback characteristic with adjustable ripple characteristics, allowing operators to feel different resistances based on specific settings, control demands, or operating states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If optical feedback means (dial indicators, meters, light indicators) are used to indicate settings and operating states, then information can be displayed to the operator, but the operator cannot haptically recognize and distinguish different settings and states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedback informationVSAvoidfeedback mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces optical feedback mechanisms with a haptic feedback mechanism using a magnetorheological actuator that generates ripple characteristics through magnetic field control. This substitution allows operators to feel different resistance patterns (ripples) corresponding to different settings and operating states, providing tactile information without adding mechanical complexity to the feedback delivery system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the magnetic field parameters (current magnitude and frequency) to the magnetorheological fluid to dynamically adjust ripple characteristics. By varying these parameters, the system can indicate different settings, control demands, and operating states through distinct haptic patterns, enabling rich information transmission through a single actuator without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a magnetorheological actuator is used to provide haptic feedback, then operators can feel resistance variations, but the ability to distinctly recognize and differentiate various settings and operating states is insufficient with fixed ripple characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic recognition capabilityVSAvoidripple characteristic adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of ripple characteristics by controlling the magnetorheological actuator with variable current parameters. The system can adapt ripple frequency, magnitude, and pattern in real-time based on different operating conditions, allowing operators to distinctly recognize different settings and states through differentiated haptic feedback patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the single magnetorheological actuator perform multiple functions by programming it to generate different ripple characteristics for different purposes: indicating normal operation, warning of hazardous conditions, confirming settings, and guiding control inputs. This multi-functionality enables comprehensive haptic communication without adding multiple separate actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If ripple characteristics are adjusted to indicate different settings and operating states, then haptic feedback becomes more informative, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating state informationVSAvoidcontrol unit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control loop where the control unit receives signals about current operating state and settings from the agricultural machine's control system, automatically selects appropriate ripple characteristics, and adjusts the magnetorheological actuator accordingly. This automated feedback mechanism provides rich haptic information without requiring complex manual control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the haptic feedback control function with the existing agricultural machine control system. The control unit integrates with the machine's existing sensors, actuators, and control logic, sharing computational resources and communication protocols. This merging approach provides comprehensive haptic feedback without duplicating control system infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The user interface enables operators to haptically recognize and distinguish different settings, control demands, and operating states of the agricultural machine by adjusting the ripple characteristics of the haptic feedback, improving operational efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

The user interface may comprise an actuator for providing a haptic feedback to the user, e. g. a vibration, for indicating a specific situation such as a hazardous driving situation. The actuator may be of a magnetorheological type.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetorheological effect: Magnetorheological Fluid

Data Source

PatentEP4550093A1Adaptive haptic feedback control of an user interface
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 AGCO INT GMBH
  • EP4550093A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4550093A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP4550093A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A user interface (3) for controlling an agricultural machine (10) and a method of adjusting a haptic feedback of an user interface (3) including method steps for determining a set point position (αS), determining a current position (αC) of the input element (9), and adjusting a ripple characteristic of at least one ripple according to a second ripple characteristic (606) being different to a first ripple characteristic (604) if the at least one ripple is located within an adjustment range (622) extending between the set point position (αS) and the current position (αC) of the input element (9).